Abstract
This paper develops a simplified pedagogical or toy model of (finite-dimensional non-relativistic) quantum mechanics (QM). The model uses vector spaces over \(\mathbb{Z}_{2}=\{0,1\}\), where the \(0,1\)-vectors can also be interpreted as sets, so the model is "quantum mechanics over sets" or QM/Sets. At the level of sets, the key notion is that of a partition or, equivalently, an equivalence relation. Partitions are the logical-level notions to model distinctions versus indistinctions, definiteness versus indefiniteness, or distinguishability versus indistinguishability. Those pairs of concepts are the key to understanding the non-classical 'weirdness' of QM. The key non-classical notion in QM is the notion of superposition, i.e., the notion of a state that is indefinite between two or more definite- or eigen-states. As Richard Feynman emphasized, all the weirdness of QM is illustrated in the double-slit experiment so the QM/Sets version is used to make the key points. The simplified model provides an explanation and intuitive picture to answer the key question: "How can the particle get to the detection wall without passing through one slit or the other?"
Reference34 articles.
1. Ellerman, David. 2024. Partitions, Indefiniteness, and Quantum Reality: The Objective Indefiniteness Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
2. Weyl, Hermann. 1949. Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Dirac, Paul A. M. 1958. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.
4. Cushing, James T. 1988. "Foundational Problems in and Methodological Lessons from Quantum Field Theory." In Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, edited by Harvey R. Brown and Rom Harre, 25-39. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Auletta, Gennaro, Mauro Fortunato, and Giorgio Parisi. 2009. Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.