Publish or perish: time for a rethink?

Author:

Saxena SangeetaORCID,Godfrey Thomas,Yannessa John

Abstract

The aphorism ‘publish or perish’ has been gaining traction in Academia at an accelerated rate, resulting in more than 1.8 million articles published every year. This has led to newer publishing models, where researchers pay to publish, so that readers globally have free, unlimited access to articles. The rationale for this phenomenon is the benefit of faster and greater knowledge for researchers, readers and the society. This has unintended consequences. Much of the published research is proven to have limited value. Worse, the immense pressure on medical teachers and researchers to publish to maintain respect and status in their community forces some to unethical practices, while fueling a lucrative publication business with large profit margins. This explosive growth in the number of journals published, is producing a genre of predatory journals who do not maintain requisite quality and ethical standards. This deluge of information has prompted some institutions to initiate measures to level the playing field, ensuring that research publication brings value, instituting a check on unethical practices, and perhaps most importantly delinking teaching and research. Much more needs to be done.

Publisher

Qeios Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Chi Y. Global trends in medical journal publishing. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(8):1120-1121. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.8.1120

2. Scientific literature: Information overload

3. Buranyi S. Is the staggeringly profitable business of Scientific Publishing Bad for Science? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science. Published June 27, 2017. Accessed October 30, 2022.

4. The pressure to publish pushes down quality

5. Open to the public: paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3