Measuring Complexity using Information

Author:

Jaffe KlausORCID

Abstract

Measuring complexity in multidimensional systems with high degrees of freedom and a variety of types of information, remains an important challenge. Complexity of a system is related to the number and variety of components, the number and type of interactions among them, the degree of redundancy, and the degrees of freedom of the system. Examples show that different disciplines of science converge in complexity measures for low and high dimensional problems. For low dimensional systems, such as coded strings of symbols (text, computer code, DNA, RNA, proteins, music), Shannon’s Information Entropy (expected amount of _information_ in an event drawn from a given distribution) and Kolmogorov‘s Algorithmic Complexity (the length of the shortest algorithm that produces the object as output), are used for quantitative measurements of complexity. For systems with more dimensions (ecosystems, brains, social groupings), network science provides better tools for that purpose. For complex highly multidimensional systems, none of the former methods are useful. Useful Information Φ (Information that produces thermodynamic free energy) can be related to complexity. Φ can be quantified by measuring the thermodynamic Free Energy F and/or useful Work it produces. Here I propose to measure Complexity as Total Information I, defined as the information of the system, including Φ, useless information or Noise N, and Redundant Information R. Measuring one or more of these variables allows quantifying and classifying complexity. Complexity and Information are two windows overlooking the same fundamental phenomenon broadening out tools to quantify both.

Publisher

Qeios Ltd

Reference62 articles.

1. Peliti, L., & Vulpiani, A. (Eds.). (1988). Measures of complexity. Berlin, Germany:: Springer.

2. Lopez-Ruiz, R., Mancini, H. L., & Calbet, X. (1995). A statistical measure of complexity. Physics letters A, 209(5-6), 321-326.

3. Vovk, V., Papadopoulos, H., & Gammerman, A. (2015). Measures of Complexity. Springer.

4. Wiesner, K., & Ladyman, J. (2019). Measuring complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.13243.

5. Heylighen, Francis (1999). The Growth of Structural and Functional Complexity during Evolution, in; F. Heylighen, J. Bollen & A. Riegler (Eds.) The Evolution of Complexity. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht): 17–44.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3