Abstract
It is often claimed that Einstein is wrong about quantum mechanics. However, when comparisons are made with respect to theoretical foundations rather than experimental results Einstein’s theories are found to be superior. Although statistical formulations of quantum mechanics correctly describe energy and momentum exchange with remarkable accuracy there are individual cases, paradoxically, that violate the conservation laws. A recent study finds that in order to account for observed violations frames of reference involved in preparation of the initial state must be explicitly taken into account [1]. We show here that the same conclusion was arrived at in a much simpler way by Einstein over 100 years ago. Deficiencies in the foundations of non-relativistic theory are corrected by introducing Hamilton’s principle and deriving relativistic equations of motion. This allows quantum mechanical formalism in abstract space to be replaced by the superposition of particle field geometries in real space. Applying the calculus of variations to the Schrödinger wave equation reveals that the wave function is incomplete because it requires twice the allowable action minimum.
Reference10 articles.
1. Conservation laws and the foundations of quantum mechanics
2. On conservation laws in quantum mechanics
3. A. Einstein, “Quantum theory of radiation” Phys Z 18, 121 (1917). W.
4. Heisenberg W. “Quantum mechanical re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations”, Z Phys 33, 879 (1925) in B.L. van der Waerden (ed.), Sources of Quantum Mechanics, (Dover, 1968).
5. Brown, L.M., Feynman’s thesis: A new approach to quantum theory (World Scientific Publishing Co., 2005), p. 4.