Author:
Greenspan Neil S.,Han Owen
Abstract
This perspective explores the ways in which random somatic mutation and selection can influence phenotypes that are biologically or clinically consequential. We also discuss the ways in which genetic research from recent decades has provided impetus to think about how _de novo_ mutations in parental germ cells and somatic mutations in progeny might affect progeny phenotypes and heritability. The phenomenon of extended phenotype is characterized and discussed in terms of the impact it has on influencing phenotypes in ways that might affect heritability. We therefore propose revising the broad heritability equation to reflect these experimental advances and better convey the full range of factors that can exert influence over organismal phenotypes. Finally, we consider how an analogy between changes in axiom systems and mutational changes in genomes prompts consideration of a broader comparison between formal deductive systems and the structured genetic systems of cells and organisms.
Reference37 articles.
1. Service, R. F. Could a popular antiviral supercharge the pandemic? Science 2023, 379 (6632), 526–526.
2. Nowell, P. C. The minute chromosome (Ph1) in chronic granulocytic leukemia. Blut Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Blutforschung 1962, 8 (2), 65–66.
3. Nowell, P. C.; Hungerford, D. A. Chromosome studies on normal and leukemic human leukocytes. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1960, 25 (1), 85–109.
4. Rowley, J. D. A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and giemsa staining. Nature 1973, 243 (5405), 290–293.
5. Nowell, P. C. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 1976, 194 (4260), 23–28.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献