Graft Angiography Through Right Radial Artery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Hashmi Muhammad Omer,Ashfaq Fatima,Ali Shah Syed Basit,Talat Fawad,Malik JahanzebORCID,Akhtar Waheed

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of graft angiography through the right radial artery. METHODS: A total of 1,634 patients who underwent graft angiography through the right radial artery were included in the study. Baseline characteristics, angiographic features, procedural parameters, and outcomes were analyzed. The study population was compared with a control group of 1,000 patients who underwent graft angiography through other access routes. Statistical analysis was performed to assess differences between the groups. RESULTS: The procedural success rate for graft angiography through the right radial artery was 95.6%. The most common indication for angiography was postoperative follow-up (53%), followed by symptoms of angina or ischemia (32.6%). Complications were infrequent, with bleeding being the most common adverse event (2.3%). Other complications, such as hematoma formation, pseudoaneurysm, radial artery occlusion, and nerve injury, were rare. Procedural parameters, including fluoroscopy time, contrast usage, and total procedure time, were comparable between the study population and the control group. Comparison with the control group revealed a significantly higher incidence of bleeding in the study population (p = 0.002), with an odds ratio of 2.53 (95% CI: 1.40-4.59). However, there were no statistically significant differences in other complications. Procedural parameters showed no significant differences between the study population and the control group. CONCLUSION: Graft angiography through the right radial artery demonstrated a high procedural success rate and relatively low complication rates.

Publisher

Qeios Ltd

Reference13 articles.

1. Lazzara RR, Kidwell FE, Griffith R. A new technique for intraoperative graft angiography utilizing the radial artery stump. Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(2):123-5; discussion 125-6. PMID: 11074966.

2. Pasley TF, Khan A, Yen LY, Newcombe R, Humphreys H, El-Jack S. Left Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Mar;28(3):81-4. Epub 2016 Feb 15. PMID: 26887028.

3. Spies JB, Berlin L. Complications of femoral artery puncture. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):9-11. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.1.9423587. PMID: 9423587.

4. Malik J, Javed N, Naeem H. A comparative study of Terumo radial Band® and PreludeSYNC hemostasis compression device after transradial coronary catheterization. Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Jun;25(6):402-406. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.34694. PMID: 34100727; PMCID: PMC8210938.

5. Brzezinski M, Luisetti T, London MJ. Radial artery cannulation: a comprehensive review of recent anatomic and physiologic investigations. Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1763-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbd416. PMID: 19923502.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3