Abstract
The present study deals with two types of L2 glosses, namely dynamic and traditional text-based glosses. The former were presented to students as a set of prompts designed to help learners identify the correct keyword, whereas the latter were introduced as traditional annotations containing L1 equivalents. A third control group was included in the study. Particularly, the focus is to compare the effects of these two types of glosses in Primary Education students of EFL. During the treatment session the dynamic glossing and the traditional glossing groups were presented three short texts with some unknown words. After the treatment, the three groups were tested in terms of both receptive and productive knowledge of the unknown words. Testing was carried out immediately and some weeks after the treatment. The results of immediate and delayed post tests revealed the superiority of the dynamic condition over traditional glossing and the control group as regards the two types of L2 vocabulary knowledge.
Publisher
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference64 articles.
1. Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Retrieved from: https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/paper/11063
2. Alcaraz-Mármol, G. & Almela, Á. (2013). "The Involvement Load Hypothesis: Its effect on vocabulary learning in Primary Education". Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 26, 11-24.
3. Ahmad, S.Z. (2019). "Multimedia glosses for enhancing EFL students' vocabulary acquisition and retention". English Language Teaching 12/12, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n12p46
4. Anderson-Inman, L. & Horney, M. A. (2007). "Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations". Reading Research Quarterly 42/1, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.1.8
5. Antón, M. (2009). "Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners". Foreign Language Annals 42, 576-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献