Author:
Rommers Jorine,De Greef Karel H.
Abstract
<p>Group housing of lactating rabbit does is desirable from a welfare standpoint, but agonistic behaviour can cause severe skin injuries, which are undesired for animal welfare. Park layout, creating hiding places and escape possibilities, may help redirect attention away from fighting, which could in turn help prevent skin damage. An experiment was performed to test whether more damaging behaviour would occur in a combi park (with nest box panels) after mixing, compared to a regular park for fatteners, as nest box panels would obstruct does when escaping aggressive interactions. In addition, the position of the PVC pipe underneath the platform differed between parks (longitudinal or transversal), resulting in different escape routes. Twenty-two parks were used, in which 5 does per park were grouped at 23 d of lactation until weaning at 36 d of lactation. Skin injuries were scored at 4 d after grouping and on the day before weaning. The presence of nest box panels in a combi park and the position of the PVC pipe underneath the platform did not affect the level of skin damage. Moderate to severe injuries were observed, mostly at the hind quarters, ears and head. Five to 6% of the does were severely injured (wounds). There was a positive relationship between the average skin injury per park at 4 d after grouping and at weaning. On average, average injury score per park increased from grouping to weaning, but there are differences between individual parks. From this experiment it can be concluded that group housing of lactating rabbit does involves animals getting injured. In fact, 5 to 6% of the does were severely injured (wounds). Social dynamics of group housed does are insufficiently understood and might be important to reduce damaging behaviour in group housing.</p>
Publisher
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology
Reference19 articles.
1. Andrist C.A., Bigler L.M., Würbel H., Roth B.A. 2012. Effects of group stability on aggression, stress and injuries in breeding rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 142: 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.10.017
2. Andrist C.A., Borne van den H.P., Bigler L.M., Buchwalder T., Roth B.A. 2013. Epidemiologic survey in Swiss grouphoused breeding rabbits. Extend of lesions and potential risk factors. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 108: 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.07.015
3. Buijs S., Vangeyte J., Tuyttens F.A.M. 2016. Effects of communal rearing and group size on breeding rabbits'post-grouping behaviour and its relation to anogenital distance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 182: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.06.005
4. Greef de K.H., Rommers J.M., Lavrijsen S. 2016. Market and society driven innovations in the Dutch Rabbit production system. In Proc.: 11th World Rabbit Congress, Qingdao (China) June 15-18, 953-956.
5. Hoy S., Verga M. 2006. Welfare indicators. In: Recent Advances in Rabbit Sciences, L. Maertens and P. Coudert (eds). Melle: ILVO, pp 71-74.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献