Abstract
Objective: To provide a working guide which facilitates the accuracy, transparency, and usefulness for academics and practitioners of case report papers as an article type which are fit for publishing in impact journals. In this way, we aim to increase the use and dissemination of recommendations in aid of the writing and publication of case study and action research. Theoretical framework: A case report paper presents a story in narrative form and includes current individual or organisational concerns, situational diagnoses, interventions, outcomes including adverse events, and follow-up. The narrative should include a discussion of the rationale for any conclusions and lessons learned. Method: We analysed the prevalence of these type of articles in publications as indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and in Scopus; we explain how we customised the case report guidelines (CAse REport or CARE) to optimise them for the scientific field of Management focussing particularly on Operations Management and Human Resources Management. We shared for discussion and feedback the adapted proposal among a group of academics and professionals in the field of Management. Outcomes/Implications: Robust reporting guidelines help to improve research performance, reduce bias risk, provide information on the implementation of management practices, support the training of management professionals, and enable informed editorial decisions by journal editors and reviewers.
Publisher
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference66 articles.
1. Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334
2. Alfaro-Tanco, J. A., Avella, L., Moscoso, P., & Näslund, D. (2021). An Evaluation Framework for the Dual Contribution of Action Research: Opportunities and Challenges in the Field of Operations Management. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211017636. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211017636
3. Armstrong, J. S., & Pagell, R. (2003). The ombudsman: Reaping benefits from management research: Lessons from the forecasting principles project. Interfaces, 33(6), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.6.91.25180
4. Baig, M., Sayedalamin, Z., Almouteri, O., Algarni, M., & Allam, H. (2016). Perceptions, perceived barriers and practices of physicians' towards Evidence-Based Medicine. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(1), 49-54. ://WOS:000369318000012
5. Bigelow, B., & Arndt, M. (2003). Teaching evidence-based management: where do we go from here? The Journal of health administration education, 20(4), 305-312. ://MEDLINE:14717519
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献