Discourse features of scientific abstracts on agricultural topics in the English language

Author:

Petrovskaya Anastasia V.1

Affiliation:

1. I.S. Lupinovich Belarus Agricultural Library of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

Abstract

The article describes the discourse features of abstracts of scientific papers on agriculture: logicality, abstractness, performativity, terminology, specific sentence length, structural categories and components. It was found that the logicality was achieved due to contrastive, elaborative, inferential and temporal discourse markers in the abstracts of the scientific publications on agriculture in the English language. The abstractness was expressed by the predominance of indefinite or zero articles and the use of words describing processes and phenomena. The terminology of the abstracts of the scientific articles on agricultural topics was described in accordance with the following classification: 1) well-known terms; 2) special professional terms; 3) abbreviations. The performativity was manifested in the first person material presentation using general science clichés. The predominance of sentences the length of which ranges from 16 to 25 words was observed in the abstracts of the scientific articles on the agricultural topics. It was found that most of these abstracts were characterized by the following structural components: background (72%), aims (73%), research methods and materials (62%), results (80%), conclusions (58%).

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

Reference11 articles.

1. Kasimova S. V. The maintenance and concept borders «the secondary text». Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika = Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 2010, no. 2, pp. 28–31 (in Russian).

2. Popova N. G., Koptyaeva N. N. Academic writing: articles in IMRAD format. Ekaterinburg, Ural Federal University, 2016. 166 p. (in Russian).

3. Kravtsova E. V. Scientific discourse: universal and culturally specific: based on the “scientific review” genre. Abstract of Ph.D. diss. Chelyabinsk, 2016. 23 p. (in Russian).

4. Chubarova Yu. E. Functional and structural features and prosodic means of expressing the discourse elements of educational and scientific discourse in the English language. Abstract of Ph.D. diss. Saransk, 2008. 15 p. (in Russian).

5. Chaudron C., Richards J. C. The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics, 1986, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.2.113

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3