Affiliation:
1. DOC Berlin Berlin Germany
Abstract
Abstract
This paper adopts the wide definition of civil society, namely the one suggested by the EU. It includes all sorts of private collectives from producer groups, trade unions, care and common cause organizations, NGOs, to social and protest movements. Distinguishing between a structural (governance) and an actor-centred perspective (collective action) and, orthogonally, two levels of territorial complexity (the sub-, and the supranational), the history of the relationship between the EU and civil society is presented for the period of the past 35 years. It turns out that despite enormous efforts invested in the relationship from the part of both sides, and of many heroic declamations aimed at pathbreaking reform, the outcome tends to be relatively meagre and disenchanting both in institutional and organizational terms.
Reference47 articles.
1. Armstrong, K. A. 2002. Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance. In: European Law Journal, 8(1): 102–132.
2. Bauman, Z. 2017. Retrotopia. Polity Press.
3. Blockmans, S. and S.Russack (eds.) 2019. Direct Democracy in the EU: The Myth of a Citizens’ Union. Rowman & Littlefield.
4. CSE 2013. Building Civil Society Europe; European Coordination of Civil Society Organisations; Civil Society Europe (CSE). Rome, December 16, 2013.
5. CSE 2019. Open Letter to the President-designate of the EU Commission, Ms. u. von der Leyen; Civil Society Europe (CSE). Brussels, July 25, 2019.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献