From the Archival Bond to the Informational Bond

Author:

Pacheco André1ORCID,Silva Carlos Guardado da1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Lisbon , Lisboa , Portugal

Abstract

Abstract The archival bond is the embodiment of the relationships shared amongst records generated in the course of the same activity, by the same creator. It has been one of the key governing principles of the archival profession since its inception. At the heart of this concept is the notion that records only acquire meaning and identity in the context of the aggregation they originally belong to. This interpretation has been guided by an analog worldview of archives in which creators, activities, and fonds are easily delimited constructs. With the digitalization of recordkeeping, these boundaries are meshed in favor of more fluid processes that prioritize the flow and recombination of information across several systems and classification schemes. This article attempts to revisit the concept of archival bond under the light of the current information paradigm with the goals of examining its fundamental notions, discussing its application and limitations. The methodology is qualitative and relies on documentary research. A literature review on the archival bond is conducted through the consultation of Web of Science and Scopus databases. As an expansion of the archival bond, a novel concept of informational bond is suggested as an attempt to more accurately capture the context of digital information and to reinforce the trustworthiness of archival representations.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Conservation

Reference48 articles.

1. Bailey, J. 2013. “Disrespect des fonds: Rethinking arrangement and description in born-digital archives.” Archive Journal 3.

2. Bautier, R. H. 1970. “Les Archives.” In Manuel d’Archivistique. Paris: Direction des Archives de France.

3. Bearman, D. 1996. “Item Level Control and Electronic Recordkeeping.” Archives and Museum Informatics 10 (3): 195–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02802369.

4. Bellotto, H. L. 2015. “A Diplomática como chave da teoria arquivística.” Archeion Online 3 (2): 4–13.

5. Bellotto, H. L. 2018. “Concepto de especie documental como antecedente al tipo en la teoría archivística.” Boletín ANABAD 68 (3–4): 446–55.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3