Affiliation:
1. School of Business , Universidad Francisco Marroquín , Ciudad de Guatemala , 01010 , Guatemala
2. Department of Economics , Universidad Carlos III de Madrid , Getafe , 28903 , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
We suggest a new value-at-risk (VaR) framework using EGARCH (exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity) models with score-driven expected return, scale, and shape filters. We use the EGB2 (exponential generalized beta of the second kind), NIG (normal-inverse Gaussian), and Skew-Gen-t (skewed generalized-t) distributions, for which the score-driven shape parameters drive the skewness, tail shape, and peakedness of the distribution. We use daily data on the Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) index for the period of February 1990 to October 2021. For all distributions, likelihood-ratio (LR) tests indicate that several EGARCH models with dynamic shape are superior to the EGARCH models with constant shape. We compare the realized volatility with the conditional volatility estimates, and we find two Skew-Gen-t specifications with dynamic shape, which are superior to the Skew-Gen-t specification with constant shape. The shape parameter dynamics are associated with important events that affected the stock market in the United States (US). VaR backtesting is performed for the dot.com boom (January 1997 to October 2020), the 2008 US Financial Crisis (October 2007 to March 2009), and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic (January 2020 to October 2021). We show that the use of the dynamic shape parameters improves the VaR measurements.
Funder
Universidad Francisco Marroquín
The Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
Consolidation Grant
Maria de Maeztu Grant
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Analysis,Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Analysis
Reference47 articles.
1. Andersen, T. G., and T. Bollerslev. 1998. “Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do Provide Accurate Forecasts.” International Economic Review 39 (4): 885–905. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527343.
2. Ayala, A., S. Blazsek, and A. Escribano. 2019. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Score-Driven Models with Dynamic Shape Parameters: An Application to Monte Carlo Value-At-Risk.” In Working Paper, 19–2: University Carlos III of Madrid, Department of Economics. Also available at https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/28638.
3. Backus, D., M. Chernov, and I. Martin. 2011. “Disasters Implied by Equity Index Options.” Journal of Finance 66 (6): 1969–2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01697.x.
4. Bakshi, G., N. Kapadia, and D. Madan. 2003. “Stock Return Characteristics, Skew Laws, and the Differential Pricing of Individual Equity Options.” The Review of Financial Studies 16 (1): 101–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/16.1.0101.
5. Basel Committee. 1996. “Supervisory Framework for the Use of “Backtesting” in Conjunction with the Internal Models Approach to Market Risk Capital Requirements.” Also Available at www.bis.org.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献