Affiliation:
1. University of Fribourg , Fribourg , Switzerland
Abstract
Abstract
Speed of linguistic change is not constant: it differs as between different language and dialects, and between different chronological periods. These differences are, at least to some extent, conditioned by social parameters. Two major social factors are involved in producing these different rates of linguistic change. There is, first, the role of the relative degree of contact versus isolation which speech communities have experienced: a good example is provided by the contrast between Faroese and Icelandic as opposed to the continental Scandinavian languages. There is, secondly, an important role for relative social stability versus social instability in the histories of communities. There is considerable evidence to suggest that conservative language varieties generally tend to be the ones which are relatively more geographically isolated than rapid-change varieties, as well as being relatively more stable as this paper illustrates, through a study of the linguistic consequences of social upheavals involving different historical periods, different continents, and different languages.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference41 articles.
1. Bailey, Guy, Tom Wikle, Jan Tillery & Lori Sand. 1996. The linguistic consequences of catastrophic events: An example from the American Southwest. In J. Arnold, R. Blake, B. Davidson, S. Schwenter & J. Solomon (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory and analysis, 435–451. Stanford: CSLI.
2. Bartoli, Matteo. 1945. Saggi di linguistica spaziale. Turin: Bona.
3. Beaken, Michael. 1996. The making of language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Blust, Robert. 2007. Òma Lóngh historical phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 46. 1–53.
5. Bonfante, Giuliano. 1947. The neolinguistic position. Language 23. 344–375.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献