Affiliation:
1. University of Tartu , Tartu , Estonia
Abstract
Abstract
The analysis of social communication in other-than-human animals poses several theoretical challenges due to the complexity of individual and extra-individual variables. Some previous studies have found a valuable solution in Uexküll’s work by expanding and adapting its usage for the study of communication in a heurtistic manner. An Umwelt analysis provides a theoretical toolbox, which allows researchers to take an emic perspective on the lives and phenomenal world of other animals. However, Umwelt and its elaborations do not allow for a clear distinction between acts of perception and communication and seem to ignore factors that escape the specific communication contexts under analysis. Thus, moving away from the existing linear and cyclical approaches to communication, we propose a complementary approach to the study of social communication by combining Barnlund’s transactional model of communication with Umwelt theory and the functional circle more specifically. Our elaborated model conceives social communication as the process of creating meaning through the interaction of two (or more) subjects and emphasizes the role of species-specific and individual features in its creation. Our goal is to re-evaluate the research on social communication of other-than-human animals by advocating for the theoretical and empirical potential of Umwelt, especially pertaining to animals with complex Umwelten. Our model offers a valuable solution to the analysis of intraspecies communication that accounts for the role of private and public cues as well as the subjects’ specific behaviors, messages, and context in the creation of meaning.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference58 articles.
1. Allen, Colin. 2014. Umwelt or Umwelten? How should shared representation be understood given such diversity? Semiotica 198(1/4). 137–158.
2. Barnlund, Dean C. 1962. Toward a meaning-centred philosophy of communication. Journal of Communication 12(4). 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1962.tb01547.x.
3. Barnlund, Dean C. 1970. A transactional model of communication. In Johnnye Akin, Alvin Goldberg, Joseph Stewart & Gail Myers (eds.), Language behavior: A book of readings in communication, 43–61. The Hague: Mouton.
4. Beever, Jonathan & Morten Tønnessen. 2013. “Darwin und die englische Moral”: The moral consequences of Uexküll’s Umwelt theory. Biosemiotics 6(3). 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9180-x.
5. Bekoff, Marc. 1972. The development of social interaction, play, and metacommunication in mammals: An ethological perspective. Quarterly Review of Biology 47(4). 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1086/407400.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献