Affiliation:
1. Academy of Athens Research Centre for Greek Philosophy Anagnostopoulou 14 Athens Greece
Abstract
Abstract
Since the publication of The verb “be” in Ancient Greek by Charles Kahn, people have put a lot of emphasis and invested too much labor in all kinds of historico-philological analyses in order to resolve philosophical questions regarding the concept of existence in Greek thought. Useful as these analyses might be, they cannot provide us with conclusive answers to the specific philosophical questions under scrutiny, and, perhaps, it is time for us to abandon the overwhelming optimist motivating the pioneers behind these attempts. I use the Sophist as a case study. I conclude that whether the Form of Being represents existence or predication cannot be settled on speculation regarding the syntax of the verb εἶναι; absolute εἶναι need not be existential in meaning, and complemented εἶναι may be existential in meaning.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference103 articles.
1. Ackrill, John L. (1997): “ΣΥΜΠΛΟΚΗ ΕΙΔΩΝ” (originally published in 1955); repr. in: Essays on Plato and Aristotle. John L. Ackrill (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–79.
2. Ambuel, David (2013): “Difference in Kind: Observations on the Distinction of the Megista Gene”. In: Beatriz Bossi & Thomas M. Robinson (eds.): Plato’s Sophist Revisited. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 247–268.
3. Benardete, Seth (1984): The Being of the Beautiful: Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Berman, Scott (1996): “Plato’s Explanation of False Belief in the Sophist”, Apeiron 29. No 1, pp. 19–46.
5. Bluck, Richard S. (1975): Plato’s Sophist: A Commentary. Gordon C. Neal (ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.