An Examination of the Implementation of Risk Based Approaches in Military Operations

Author:

Liwång Hans1,Ericson Marika2,Bang Martin3

Affiliation:

1. M.Sc. and Licentiate in Shipping and Marine Technology, in Ph.D program, Swedish National Defence College and Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

2. LL.M. in Law, in Ph.D program, Swedish National Defence College and Uppsala University, Sweden

3. M.Sc. in Pol. Sci., in Ph.D program, Swedish National Defence College and Finnish National Defence University, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Today several nations utilise risk based approaches in military planning. However, the discussion on limitations with the approaches in regard to aspects such as uncertainties, the nature of the threat and risk to civilians is limited. The aim of this work is to identify important challenges when applying risk based approaches to military activity. This article discusses risk based approaches in general and their military applications. Five generic quality requirements on risk analysis are presented from research in risk philosophy. Two military application areas for risk analysis: military intelligence, and risk management in legal assessments are analysed in relation to the presented quality requirements on risk analysis. From the analysis it is clear that risk analysis is an integral part of the decision-making analysis and cannot be separated in time, space or organisationally from the decision-making process in general. Defining the scenario to analyse, including the time span, is a central task in risk analysis and will affect every aspect of the risk estimation. Therefore, the principles for scenario definition must be communicated and continuously updated throughout the organisation. Handling the uncertainties throughout the process is also important, especially if the aim is a resilient military system.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference40 articles.

1. Amnesty International. (2000). NATO/Federal Republic of Yugoslavia “Collateral damage” or unlawful killings? Violations of the Laws of War by NATO during Operation Allied Force: Amnesty International.

2. Andrews, J. D., & Moss, T. R. (2002). Risk assessment Reliability and risk assessment (Second ed., pp. 411-448). London: Professional Engineering Publishing Limited.

3. Aven, T. (2009). Identification of safety and security critical systems and activities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(2), 404-411.

4. Bakx, G. C. H., & Richardson, R. A. L. (2013). Risk assessments at the Royal Netherlands Air Force: An explorative study. Journal of Risk Research, 16(5), 595-611.

5. Bang, M. (2014). Pitfalls in Military Quantitative Intelligence Analysis: Incident Reporting in a Low Intensity Conflict. Intelligence and National Security.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3