Affiliation:
1. United Kingdom Royal Air Force , London , UK
2. Department of Economics , 6816 University of Reading , Reading RG6 6AA , UK
Abstract
Abstract
The relationship between government defence expenditure and economic growth is a debated topic. This study uses UK data for the period of 1960–2012 and applies two of the most prevailing theories used within the literature, the ‘Feder-Ram’ and the ‘augmented Solow’ models, to assess this question. We utilise traditional model specifications, alongside extensively altered versions of both models, enabling a comprehensive comparison between them. The alterations to the models include re-evaluating how core variables are expressed, inclusion of measures of conflict, the impact of recession, etc. The results show that the augmented Solow model outperforms the Feder-Ram model, and we provide some explanations for this result. In addition, our results suggest that military expenditure has a positive effect on economic growth within the UK, implying that the decision to reduce defence spending may have been detrimental to the UK economy.
Reference74 articles.
1. Abdel-Khalek, G., M. G. Mazloum, and M. R. M. El Zeiny. 2019. “Military Expenditure and Economic Growth: The Case of India.” Review of Economics and Political Science 5 (2): 116–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-03-2019-0025.
2. Adams, F. G., J. R. Behrman, and M. Boldin. 1991. “Government Expenditures, Defense and Economic Growth in the LDCs: A Revised Perspective.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 11: 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/073889429101100202.
3. Aizenman, J., and R. Glick. 2006. “Military Expenditure, Threats and Growth.” Journal of Internation Trade & Economic Development 15: 129–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190600689095.
4. Alexander, R. 1990. “The Impact of Defence Spending on Economic Growth.” Defence and Peace Economics 2: 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10430719008404677.
5. Alexander, R., and P. Hansen. 2004. “A Critique of the Multi-Sector Model of the Effects of Military Spending on Economic Growth.” Applied Econometrics and International Development 4: 35–54.