Affiliation:
1. Philipps-Universität Marburg Institut für Geschichte der Pharmazie Marburg Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Coptic pharmacological texts offer a multitude of medical prescriptions concerning various afflictions, such as eye or skin irritations, affections of the viscera, or even psychological complaints. The content of these texts is medical, and in most cases bereft of any magical or religious ideas. They usually compile prescriptions according to symptoms and/or afflictions, without any further organising principle. Only a handful of texts are grouped according to the illness or to the medicinal plants used. Almost every prescription follows a pattern, with four formal elements: 1) the medical indication (or purpose), 2) the (basic) ingredients, 3) the procedure and application, and 4) the effects and/or the effectiveness of a remedy, or further information. In this article, I give an overview of the entire corpus of Coptic medical prescriptions, explore the four main elements, and especially the discussions of efficacy. I also examine the material in light of placebo research, to see whether something like a placebo effect may have influenced how the pharmacological texts were formulated.
Reference54 articles.
1. Beck, Lily Y. (ed.) (2005), Pedanius Dioscorides of Anazarbus, De materia medica, Altertumswissenschaftliche Texte und Studien 38, Hildesheim.
2. Benedetti, Fabrizio (2014), “Placebo Effects: From the Neurological Paradigm to Translational Implications”, in: Neuron 84, 623–637. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.023
3. Biedenkopf-Ziehner, Anneliese (2000), Koptische Ostraka. I, Ostraka aus dem Britischen Museum in London. Mit Einführung in das Formular der vorgelegten Urkunden, Wiesbaden.
4. Bouriant, Urbain (1887), “Fragment d’un livre de médecine en copte thébain”, in: Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 31.3, 374–379.
5. Crum, Walter E. (ed.) (1939), A Coptic Dictionary, Oxford.