The Question of the Effectiveness of Coptic Pharmacological Prescriptions

Author:

Grons Anne1

Affiliation:

1. Philipps-Universität Marburg Institut für Geschichte der Pharmazie Marburg Germany

Abstract

Abstract Coptic pharmacological texts offer a multitude of medical prescriptions concerning various afflictions, such as eye or skin irritations, affections of the viscera, or even psychological complaints. The content of these texts is medical, and in most cases bereft of any magical or religious ideas. They usually compile prescriptions according to symptoms and/or afflictions, without any further organising principle. Only a handful of texts are grouped according to the illness or to the medicinal plants used. Almost every prescription follows a pattern, with four formal elements: 1) the medical indication (or purpose), 2) the (basic) ingredients, 3) the procedure and application, and 4) the effects and/or the effectiveness of a remedy, or further information. In this article, I give an overview of the entire corpus of Coptic medical prescriptions, explore the four main elements, and especially the discussions of efficacy. I also examine the material in light of placebo research, to see whether something like a placebo effect may have influenced how the pharmacological texts were formulated.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Classics

Reference54 articles.

1. Beck, Lily Y. (ed.) (2005), Pedanius Dioscorides of Anazarbus, De materia medica, Altertumswissenschaftliche Texte und Studien 38, Hildesheim.

2. Benedetti, Fabrizio (2014), “Placebo Effects: From the Neurological Paradigm to Translational Implications”, in: Neuron 84, 623–637. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.023

3. Biedenkopf-Ziehner, Anneliese (2000), Koptische Ostraka. I, Ostraka aus dem Britischen Museum in London. Mit Einführung in das Formular der vorgelegten Urkunden, Wiesbaden.

4. Bouriant, Urbain (1887), “Fragment d’un livre de médecine en copte thébain”, in: Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 31.3, 374–379.

5. Crum, Walter E. (ed.) (1939), A Coptic Dictionary, Oxford.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3