A novel multimodal approach for the assessment of phlebotomy performance in nurses

Author:

Oprea Oana Roxana12,Molnar Anca Alexandra12,Mănescu Ion Bogdan12

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Laboratory , County Emergency Clinical Hospital , Targu Mures , Romania

2. Department of Laboratory Medicine , George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures , Targu Mures , Romania

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Phlebotomy is presumably the most challenging preanalytical aspect in laboratory medicine. In Europe, inpatient phlebotomy is performed by nurses in 45–60 % of cases. We aimed to develop and test a novel phlebotomy assessment tool for nurses. Methods A group of 24 nurses working in a surgical ward was investigated. A three-pronged approach was devised: (1) a standardized knowledge test, (2) three blinded phlebotomy audits, and (3) prospective monitoring of samples sent from the investigated surgical ward for the calculation of preanalytical quality indicators. Results The average knowledge test score was 22.7/31 points (12–31, interquartile range 20.5–25). The average audit score was 14.5/18 points (13.7–14.7, interquartile range 14–15). No statistically significant correlations were found between phlebotomy knowledge (or lack of) and corresponding phlebotomy practices (or errors, respectively). Moreover, there was no statistically significant correlation between individual knowledge scores and audit scores. Several misconceptions about the preanalytical phase were identified, along with common phlebotomy errors. Conclusions Sometimes, nurses do not follow guidelines due to lack of theoretical knowledge. Other times, nurses fail to follow procedures despite having the prerequisite theoretical knowledge. We observed a discordance between theory and practice regarding certain aspects of phlebotomy. The novel multimodal methodology presented here describes an improved assessment tool and a superior alternative to the popular survey studies. This tool may be used to identify specific and recurrent phlebotomy issues and to improve institutional continuing education programs for nurses through targeted training programs.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics

Reference19 articles.

1. Simundic, AM, Cornes, M, Grankvist, K, Lippi, G, Nybo, M, Kovalevskaya, S, et al.. Survey of national guidelines, education and training on phlebotomy in 28 European countries: an original report by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PA). Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1585–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-0283.

2. Cadamuro, J, von Meyer, A, Wiedemann, H, Felder, TK, Moser, F, Kipman, U, et al.. Hemolysis rates in blood samples: differences between blood collected by clinicians and nurses and the effect of phlebotomy training. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1987–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0175.

3. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices on phlebotomy; 2010. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/268790/WHO-guidelines-on-drawing-blood-best-practices-in-phlebotomy-Eng.pdf [Accessed 30 June 2022].

4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture. Approved Standard – Sixth Edition; 2010.

5. Simundic, A, Bölenius, K, Cadamuro, J, Church, S, Cornes, M, van Dongen-Lases, E, et al.. On behalf of the working group for preanalytical phase (WG-PRE), of the European Federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM) and Latin American working group for preanalytical phase (WG-PRE-LATAM) of the Latin America confederation of clinical biochemistry (COLABIOCLI). Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI recommendation for venous blood sampling: v 1.1, June 2018. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:2015–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0602.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3