Author:
Haeckel Rainer,Gurr Eberhard,Hoff Torsten,on behalf of the working group Guid
Abstract
AbstractSeveral concepts of analytical bias and remedies to minimize bias have been suggested with the ultimate goal to disregard it. Short-term bias (within one control cycle) should be treated as a random error if it is less than the permissible limits. Long-term bias should be eliminated if it is known or circumvented by estimating intra-laboratory reference limits (RLs). Consequently, analytical uncertainty could be reduced to permissible imprecision. Then, models combining imprecision and bias would become irrelevant, and the numerical value of total analytical error would become identical with imprecision. The purpose of the present report is to simplify quality assurance schemes considerably by disregarding bias either by estimating RLs or by verifying the applied reference limits (checking the transferability) as requested by ISO and CLSI.
Subject
Biochemistry, medical,Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry
Reference58 articles.
1. Quality goals in external quality assessment are best based oin biology;Scand J Clin Lab Invest,1993
2. A new statistical method for evaluating long-term analytical performance of laboratories applied to an external quality assessment scheme for flow cytometry;Clin Chem Lab Med,2010
3. Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits;Clin Chim Acta,2014
4. New advances in method validation and measurement uncertainty aimed at improving the quality of chemical data;Anal Bioanal Chem,2004
5. Permissible limits for uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine;Clin Chem Lab Med,2015
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献