Differences in venous, capillary and interstitial glucose concentrations in individuals without diabetes after glucose load

Author:

Pleus Stefan1ORCID,Schauer Sebastian1,Baumstark Annette1ORCID,Beil Alexandra1,Jendrike Nina1,Link Manuela1,Zschornack Eva1,Beltzer Anne1,Haug Cornelia1,Freckmann Guido1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm , Ulm , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Differences between capillary and venous glucose concentrations have been reported in the past. In continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance studies, comparator measurements are often performed in venous samples, despite CGM systems typically aiming at providing capillary-like values. In this study, differences between venous, capillary and interstitial glucose concentrations, measured with a laboratory analyzer, a self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) system and an intermittent-scanning CGM system were investigated in subjects without diabetes after glucose load. Methods During the study, an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) was performed with 41 participants who had no known history of diabetes (mean age 25.5 ± 9.7 years). Venous blood samples for measurement with a laboratory analyzer were collected before drinking the standardized 75 g glucose solution and after 60 and 120 min. In parallel, capillary blood was obtained for measurement with a laboratory analyzer and an SMBG system, and interstitial glucose values were measured with an intermittent-scanning CGM system. Results Glucose concentrations in the fasting state were slightly different for the three different compartments whereas considerable differences (some median differences exceeding 30 %) in glucose concentration were observed 60 and 120 min after the start of the oGTT. Conclusions Marked differences with a high inter-individual variability between venous, capillary, and interstitial fluid glucose concentrations were found especially after glucose load. These differences can affect perceived CGM accuracy in performance studies depending on the specific comparator method used, and they are potentially relevant in clinical practice, like diabetes diagnosis.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics

Reference30 articles.

1. Beck, RW, Riddlesworth, T, Ruedy, K, Ahmann, A, Bergenstal, R, Haller, S, et al.. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:371–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19975.

2. Bolinder, J, Antuna, R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, P, Kroger, J, Weitgasser, R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388:2254–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31535-5.

3. Heinemann, L, Freckmann, G, Ehrmann, D, Faber-Heinemann, G, Guerra, S, Waldenmaier, D, et al.. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018;391:1367–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30297-6.

4. Isitt, JJ, Roze, S, Sharland, H, Cogswell, G, Alshannaq, H, Norman, GJ, et al.. Cost-effectiveness of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy in the UK. Diabetes Ther 2022;13:1875–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01324-x.

5. Han, J, Heinemann, L, Ginsberg, BH, Alva, S, Appel, M, Bess, S, et al.. The YSI 2300 analyzer replacement meeting report. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020;14:679–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296820911471.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3