Affiliation:
1. Department of Philology, Literature and Linguistics , University of Pisa , Pisa , Itay
2. Department of Modern Languages and Cultures , University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
The paper examines the relationship between vowel quantity, syllable structure and lexical stress in Latin through a quantitative analysis carried out on a corpus of literary texts taken from Cicero’s Epistulae ad familiares and Petronius’ Cena Trimalchionis. Each word of the corpus was split into syllables and phonemes. Then, the corpus was annotated with phonological and prosodic information pertaining to vowel length, syllable structure, stress and word length. Finally, the data collected were analyzed at different levels. The results are discussed in light of the findings of a previous analysis carried out on dictionary entries, confirming a close correlation between syllable structure and lexical stress, since the great majority of stressed syllables are heavy both in the literary corpus and in the dictionary. Moreover, long vowels are more frequently found in open and stressed syllables, particularly in paroxytones. The data suggest that the process leading to the loss of vowel quantity was already active (at least in some strata of Roman society) in the Latin of the Classical age, since a prosodic template similar to that occurring in many Romance developments emerges even in literary Latin texts.
Reference34 articles.
1. Adams, James N. & Nigel Vincent. 2016. Early and Late Latin: Continuity or change? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Allen, William S. 1978. Vox Latina: The pronunciation of Classical Latin, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barchi, Serena & Lucia Tamponi. Forthcoming. Shaping shapes. Sicilicus and other diacritics in Latin epigraphy. In Giovanbattista Galdi, Simon Aerts & Alessandro Papini (eds.), Varietate delectamur: Multifarious approaches to synchronic and diachronic variation in Latin. Selected papers from the 14th International Colloquium on Late and Vulgar Latin (Ghent, 2022). Turnhout: Brepols.
4. Blevins, Juliette. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 206–244. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Cser, András. 2009. The phonology of Classical Latin. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.