The Absurd as a Representation: Towards a Hermeneutics of the Inexplicable (The Problematic Case of Godot)

Author:

Rybińska Krystyna1

Affiliation:

1. PhD Studies Programme, Department of English, University of Gdańsk, ul. Wita Stwosza 51, 80–952 Gdańsk, Poland

Abstract

Abstract This article attempts to re-signify the already extensively discussed conception of the absurd attributed to the aesthetic phenomenon presented by the so-called theatre of the absurd by critically reconsidering its paradigmatic work Waiting for Godot in relation to philosophical hermeneutics (Heidegger, Gadamer, Ricoeur). The fact that Beckett’s artistic method invalidates the transparency of the mirror-like relation between reality and art is known, and yet the potential theoretical consequences of such a literary revolution do not seem to have been exhausted - particularly in respect to the category of the absurd. Hence, the presented inquiry aims to view the phenomenon quite against its common conceptualizations derived from existentialist philosophy in order to indicate a possible route of exploring it from a hermeneutic perspective and thereby challenging, to some extent, Simon Critchley’s (2004: 165) famous assertion that Beckett’s oeuvre seems “uniquely resistant to philosophical interpretation”.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference32 articles.

1. Beckett Samuel. 1984. Three conversations with Georges Duthuit. In Ruby Cohn (ed.), Disjecta: Miscellaneous writings and a dramatic fragment, 138-146. New York: Grove Press.

2. Beckett, Samuel. 2006. Waiting for Godot. London: Faber and Faber.

3. Beckett, Samuel. 2009. Three novels: Molloy, Malone dies, The Unnamable. New York: Grove/Atlantic.

4. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1977. “Man and language” and “Aesthetics and hermeneutics”. In Philosophical hermeneutics, Trans. David E. Linge, 59-69, 95-104. California: University of California Press.

5. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1994. What is truth? In Brice R. Wachterhauser (ed.), Hermeneutics and truth, Trans. Brice R. Wachterhauser, 33-46. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3