Affiliation:
1. O’Hara Professor of Philosophy and Mathematics, University of Notre Dame , 100 Malloy Hall , Notre Dame , IN 46556 , USA
2. Associate Faculty Member, Professor of Logic, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
Abstract
Abstract
According to the math tea argument, there must be real numbers that we cannot describe or define, because there are uncountably many real numbers, but only countably many definitions. And yet, the existence of pointwise-definable models of set theory, in which every individual is definable without parameters, challenges this conclusion. In this article, I introduce a flexible new method for constructing pointwise-definable models of arithmetic and set theory, showing furthermore that every countable model of Zermelo-Fraenkel ZF set theory and of Peano arithmetic PA has a pointwise-definable end extension. In the arithmetic case, I use the universal algorithm and its Σ
n
generalizations to build a progressively elementary tower making any desired individual a
n
definable at each stage n, while preserving these definitions through to the limit model, which can thus be arranged to be pointwise definable. A similar method works in set theory, and one can moreover achieve V = L in the extension or indeed any other suitable theory holding in an inner model of the original model, thereby fulfilling the resurrection phenomenon. For example, every countable model of ZF with an inner model with a measurable cardinal has an end extension to a pointwise-definable model of ZFC + V = L[μ].
Reference26 articles.
1. Artemov, S.N., and L.D. Beklemishev. 2004. “Provability Logic.” In Handbook of Philosophical Logic. 2nd ed., Vol. 13, edited by D. Gabbay, and F. Guenthner, 229–403. Dordrecht: Springer.
2. Barwise, Jon. 1971. “Infinitary Methods in the Model Theory of Set Theory.” In Logic Colloquium ’69 (Proc. Summer School and Colloq., Manchester, 1969), 53–66. Amsterdam-London: North-Holland.
3. Blanck, Rasmus. 2017. Contributions to the Metamathematics of Arithmetic. Fixed Points, Independence, and Flexibility. PhD thesis, University of Gothenburg. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/52271.
4. Blanck, Rasmus, and Ali Enayat. 2017. “Marginalia on a Theorem of Woodin.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (1): 359–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2016.8.
5. Enayat, Ali. 2005. “Models of Set Theory with Definable Ordinals.” Archive for Mathematical Logic 44: 363–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-004-0256-9.