Evaluation of chloride stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of stainless steels
Author:
Johns Earl1, Friedersdorf Fritz2, Eklund Keith1, Brockenbrough John1, Hipwell Nathan2, Brown Nate2, Stiger Matt3
Affiliation:
1. Naval Nuclear Laboratory , 814 Pittsburgh McKeesport Blvd , West Mifflin , PA 15122 , USA 2. Luna Labs USA , Charlottesville , VA , USA 3. Metalwerks Inc. , Aliquippa , PA , USA
Abstract
Abstract
The comparative chloride stress corrosion cracking (Cl-SCC) susceptibility for 304 L, 316 L, 317 L, and AL-6XN was evaluated using double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens in boiling MgCl2 by measuring the threshold stress intensity (KISCC), crack initiation time, and stage-II crack growth rate (CGR) for each material using in situ monitoring. Materials 304 L, 316 L, and 317 L were measured to have KISCC upper limit values of 2.5–5 MPa√m, substantially lower than previously measured for 304 L in DCB specimens in boiling MgCl2. The KISCC for AL-6XN was measured to be substantially higher, as would be expected in this more highly alloyed material. This work describes the challenge in measuring low KISCC values and how this was accomplished in the present work. More prototypical conditions were used to evaluate Cl-SCC behavior of 304 L using a DCB-like geometry with a smooth gauge area in a low humidity environment in the presence of MgCl2 salt. Finite element modeling (FEM) was used to establish the relationship between applied loads and stress and strain. Loading to 15 % strain led to low temperature creep that masked in situ Cl-SCC measurements. Below the yield stress (YS), no low temperature creep was observed, and Cl-SCC cracking could be distinguished using in situ methods.
Funder
US Government, Department of Energy
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference7 articles.
1. Alden, T.H. (1987). Theory of mobile dislocation density: application to the deformation of 304 stainless steel. Metall. Trans. A 18A: 51–56, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02646221. 2. Denhard, E.E. (1960). Effect of composition and heat treatment on the stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels. Corrosion 16: 359t–370t, https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-16.7.131. 3. Krueger, R. (2002). The virtual crack closure technique: history, approach, applications, NASA/CR-2002-211628 National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA, USA. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c0a/b624ba6d2f27b6e5cbad70726eb50397c2ee.pdf (Accessed 30 May 2023). 4. Prosek, T. and Iversen, A. (2008) Low temperature stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels in the atmosphere in presence of chloride deposits. In: Corrosion 2008. Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP), Houston, Texas, USA, Paper no. 08484. 5. Prosek, T., Le Gac, A., Thierry, D., Le Manchet, S., Lojewski, C., Fanica, A., Johansson, E., Canderyd, C., Dupoiron, F., Snauwaert, T., et al.. (2014). Low-temperature stress corrosion cracking of austenitic and duplex stainless steels under chloride deposits. Corrosion 70: 1052–1063, https://doi.org/10.5006/1242.
|
|