Ionospheric TEC modeling using COSMIC-2 GNSS radio occultation and artificial neural networks over Egypt
Author:
Sherif Ahmed12ORCID, Rabah Mostafa1, Mousa Ashraf El-Kutb2, Zaki Ahmed3ORCID, Anwar Mohamed3, Sedeek Ahmed4
Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Benha Faculty of Engineering , Benha University , Benha , 13 512 , Egypt 2. Geodynamic Department , National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics , Helwan , Cairo , 11421 , Egypt 3. Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering , Delta University for Science and Technology , Gamasa , 11152 , Egypt 4. Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering , Suez University , Suez , 43534 , Egypt
Abstract
Abstract
The ionospheric delay significantly impacts GNSS positioning accuracy. To address this, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was developed using the high-quality COSMIC-2 ionospheric profile dataset to predict the Total Electron Content (TEC). ANNs are adept at addressing both linear and nonlinear challenges. For this research, eight distinct ANNs were cultivated. These ANNs were designed with the following inputs Year, Month, Day, Hour, Latitude, and Longitude. Along with solar and geomagnetic parameters such as the F10.7 solar radio flux index, the Sunspot Number (SSN), the Kp index, and the ap index. The goal was to discern the most influential parameters on ionosphere prediction. After pinpointing these key parameters, an enhanced model utilizing a pioneering technique of a secondary ANN was employed with the main ANN to predict TEC values for events in 2023. The study’s findings indicate that solar parameters markedly enhance the model’s accuracy. Notably, the augmented model featuring a prelude secondary network achieved a stellar correlation coefficient of 0.99. Distributionally, 41 % of predictions aligned within the (−1≤ ΔTEC ≤1) TECU spectrum, 28 % nestled within the (1< ΔTEC ≤2) and (−2≤ ΔTEC <−1) TECU ambit, while a substantial 30 % spanned the broader (2< ΔTEC ≤5) and (−5≤ ΔTEC <−2) TECU range. In essence, this research underscores the potential of incorporating solar parameters and advanced neural network techniques to refine ionospheric delay predictions, thus boosting GNSS positioning precision.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation
Reference24 articles.
1. Basciftci, F, Inal, C, Yildirim, O, Bulbul, S. Determining regional ionospheric model and comparing with global models. Geod Vestn 2017;61:427–40. https://doi.org/10.15292//geodetski-vestnik.2017.03.427-440. 2. Mack, MJr. A statistical comparison of vertical total electron content (TEC) from three ionospheric models; 2008. Available from: http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/info/Iono.pdf. 3. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B, Lichtenegger, H, Wasle, E. GNSS global navigation satellite systems. Vienna: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008. 4. Ludwig-Barbosa, V, Sievert, T, Rasch, J, Carlström, A, Pettersson, MI, Vu, VT. Evaluation of ionospheric scintillation in GNSS radio occultation measurements and simulations. Radio Sci 2020;55:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019rs006996. 5. Sherif, A, Rabah, M, Mousa, AE, Zaki, A, Sedeek, A. Assessing the performance of IRI-2016 and IRI-2020 models using COSMIC-2 GNSS radio occultation TEC data under different magnetic activities over Egypt. J Appl Geodesy 2023:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2023-0068.
|
|