Affiliation:
1. Geodetic Institute , Leibniz University Hannover , Hannover , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) have become indispensable for acquiring highly detailed and accurate 3D representations of the physical world. However, the acquired data is subject to systematic deviations in distance measurements due to external influences, such as distance and incidence angle. This research introduces a calibration approach by applying a deep learning model based on PointNet to predict and correct these systematic distance deviations, incorporating not only the XYZ coordinates but also additional features like intensity, incidence angle, and distances within a local neighbourhood radius of 5 cm. By predicting and subsequently correcting systematic distance deviations, the quality of TLS point clouds can be improved. Hence, our model is designed to complement and build upon the foundation of prior internal TLS calibration. A data set collected under controlled environmental conditions, containing various objects of different materials, served as the basis for training and validation the PointNet based model. In addition our analysis showcase the model’s capability to accurately model systematic distance deviations, outperforming existing methods like gradient boosting trees by capturing the spatial relationships and dependencies within the data more effectively. By defining test data sets, excluded from the training process, we underscore the ongoing effectiveness of our model’s distance measurement calibration, showcasing its ability to improve the accuracy of the TLS point cloud.
Reference55 articles.
1. Holst, C, Nothnagel, A, Blome, M, Becker, P, Eichborn, M, Kuhlmann, H. Improved area-based deformation analysis of a radio telescope’s main reflector based on terrestrial laser scanning. J Appl Geodesy 2015;9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2014-0018.
2. Paffenholz, JA, Huge, J, Stenz, U. Integration von Lasertracking und Laserscanning zur optimalen Bestimmung von lastinduzierten Gewölbeverformungen. AVN 2018;125:75–89.
3. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement; 2008. https://www.iso.org/sites/JCGM/GUM-JCGM100.htm [Accessed 27 Oct 2023].
4. Koch, KR. Uncertainty of results of laser scanning data with correlated systematic effects by Monte Carlo methods. ZFV – Z Geodasie Geoinf Landmanagement 2010;135:376–85.
5. Koch, KR, Brockmann, JM. Systematic effects in laser scanning and visualization by confidence regions. J Appl Geodesy 2016;10:247–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2016-0012.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献