Entrepreneurial ecosystems as fields: Integrating meso-level institutional theory

Author:

Auschra Carolin1,Schmidt Thomas2,Sydow Joerg3

Affiliation:

1. Freie Universität Berlin Management-Department Boltzmannstr. 20 14195 Berlin Berlin Germany

2. Freie Universität Berlin Boltzmannstr. 20 14195 Berlin Berlin Germany

3. Freie Universität Berlin Management-Department Boltzmannstr. 20 14195 Berlin Berlin Germany

Abstract

Abstract Contemporary works on entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) suffer from a lack of theorization. We address this problem by conceptualizing EEs as institutional fields, which is an analytical construct that is already well-elaborated on in neo-institutional theory. This theory provides a processual lens that is sensitive to the role of both institutions and agency in field structuration. Additionally, understanding EEs as fields can help to capture dynamics within EEs as well as their relationships with other fields. Following this approach, entrepreneurial issue fields mainly focus on debates around entrepreneurship and new venture creation, whereas entrepreneurial exchange fields focus on products and services produced by and offering support for a set of mainly industry-specific new ventures. In addition, we discuss mechanisms for transformations between both types of fields.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference91 articles.

1. Ács, Z. J./Estrin, S./Mickiewicz, T./Szerb, L. (2018): Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. In: Small Business Economics, (51)2, 501–514.

2. Ács, Z. J./Stam, E./Audretsch, D. B./O’Connor, A. (2017): The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. In: Small Business Economics, (49)1, 1–10.

3. Adner, R. (2017): Ecosystem as structure. An actionable construct for strategy. In: Journal of Management, (43)1, 39–58.

4. Aldrich, H. E./Fiol, C. M. (1994): Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. In: Academy of Management Review, (19)4, 645–670.

5. Alvedalen, J./Boschma, R. (2017): A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research. Towards a future research agenda. In: European Planning Studies, (25)6, 887–903.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3