The BACH project protocol: an international multicentre total Bile Acid Comparison and Harmonisation project and sub-study of the TURRIFIC randomised trial

Author:

Markus Corey12ORCID,Coat Suzette3ORCID,Marschall Hanns-Ulrich4ORCID,Williamson Catherine5ORCID,Dixon Peter5ORCID,Fuller Maria67ORCID,Matthews Susan2ORCID,Rankin Wayne897ORCID,Metz Michael8,Hague William M.310ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Automated Laboratory , SA Pathology , Adelaide , Australia

2. Flinders University International Centre for Point-of-Care Testing, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute , Bedford Park , Australia

3. Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia

4. University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden

5. Department of Women and Children’s Health , School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College , London , UK

6. Genetics and Molecular Pathology , SA Pathology , Adelaide , Australia

7. Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia

8. Chemical Pathology Directorate , SA Pathology , Adelaide , Australia

9. Endocrine and Metabolic Unit , Royal Adelaide Hospital , Adelaide , Australia

10. Obstetric Medicine , Women’s and Children’s Hospital , North Adelaide , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Multicentre international trials relying on diagnoses derived from biochemical results may overlook the importance of assay standardisation from the participating laboratories. Here we describe a study protocol aimed at harmonising results from total bile acid determinations within the context of an international randomised controlled Trial of two treatments, URsodeoxycholic acid and RIFampicin, for women with severe early onset Intrahepatic Cholestasis of pregnancy (TURRIFIC), referred to as the Bile Acid Comparison and Harmonisation (BACH) study, with the aims of reducing inter-laboratory heterogeneity in total bile acid assays. Methods We have simulated laboratory data to determine the feasibility of total bile acid recalibration using a reference set of patient samples with a consensus value approach and subsequently used regression-based techniques to transform the data. Results From these simulations, we have demonstrated that mathematical recalibration of total bile acid results is plausible, with a high probability of successfully harmonising results across participating laboratories. Conclusions Standardisation of bile acid results facilitates the commutability of laboratory results and collation for statistical analysis. It may provide the momentum for broader application of the described techniques in the setting of large-scale multinational clinical trials dependent on results from non-standardised assays.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3