Ambulatory human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) testing: a verification of two hCG point of care devices

Author:

Kyriacou Christopher1ORCID,Yang Wei2ORCID,Kapur Shikha3,Maheetharan Shanuja2,Pikovsky Margaret1ORCID,Parker Nina1ORCID,Barcroft Jennifer1ORCID,Bobdiwala Shabnam1ORCID,Sur Shyamaly1,Stalder Catriona1,Gould Deborah2,Ofili-Yebovi Dede4ORCID,Day Andrea5ORCID,Unsworth Nick2,Wilkes Edmund H.2,Tan Tricia2ORCID,Bourne Tom16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Early Pregnancy and Acute Gynaecology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London , London , UK

2. Biochemistry Unit, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics , Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London , London , UK

3. Gynaecology Emergency Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College London , London , UK

4. Early Pregnancy Assessment Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital , London , UK

5. Early Pregnancy Assessment Unit, West Middlesex University Hospital , London , UK

6. Department of Development and Regeneration , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) measurements are used to manage women classified with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). Two point of care testing (POCT) devices that quantify hCG are commercially available. We verified the i-STAT 1 (Abbott) and the AQT 90 FLEX (Radiometer) prior to use in PUL triage. Methods Tests for precision, external quality assurance (EQA), correlation, hook effect and recovery were undertaken alongside a POCT usability assessment during this prospective multi-center verification. Results Coefficients of variation ranged between 4.0 and 5.1 % for the three i-STAT 1 internal quality control (IQC) solutions and between 6.8 and 7.3 % for the two AQT IQC solutions. Symmetric differences in POCT EQA results when compared with laboratory and EQA stock values ranged between 3.2 and 24.5 % for the i-STAT 1 and between 3.3 and 36.9 % for the AQT. Correlation coefficients (i-STAT 1: 0.96, AQT: 0.99) and goodness of fit curves (i-STAT 1: 0.92, AQT: 0.99) were excellent when using suitable whole blood samples. An hCG hook effect was noted with the i-STAT 1 between 572,194 and 799,089 IU/L, lower than the hook effect noted with the AQT, which was between 799,089 and 1,619,309 IU/L. When hematocrit concentration was considered in sample types validated for use with each device, hCG recovery was 108 % with the i-STAT 1 and 98 % with the AQT. The i-STAT 1 scored lower on usability overall (90/130) than the AQT (121/130, p<0.001, Mann-Whitney). Conclusions Both hCG POCT devices were verified for use in clinical practice. Practical factors must also be considered when choosing which device to use in each unit.

Funder

NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre

Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Imperial College London

Imperial Health Charity

National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West London

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3