Report from the HarmoSter study: inter-laboratory comparison of LC-MS/MS measurements of corticosterone, 11-deoxycortisol and cortisone

Author:

Fanelli Flaminia1ORCID,Bruce Stephen2,Cantù Marco3,Temchenko Anastasia1,Mezzullo Marco1,Lindner Johanna M.4,Peitzsch Mirko5,Binz Pierre-Alain2ORCID,Ackermans Mariette T.67,Heijboer Annemieke C.678,Van den Ouweland Jody9,Koeppl Daniel10,Nardi Elena11,Rauh Manfred10,Vogeser Michael4,Eisenhofer Graeme5ORCID,Pagotto Uberto112

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Endocrinology Research Group, Center for Applied Biomedical Research , University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy

2. Clinical Chemistry Laboratory , University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) , Lausanne , Switzerland

3. Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Institute of Laboratory Medicine EOLAB , Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale , Bellinzona , Switzerland

4. Institute of Laboratory Medicine , Hospital of the University of Munich (LMU) , Munich , Germany

5. Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus , Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden , Germany

6. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Endocrine Laboratory , Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , Netherlands

7. University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , Netherlands

8. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam , Netherlands

9. Department of Clinical Chemistry , Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , Netherlands

10. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine , University Hospital , Erlangen , Germany

11. Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine , University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy

12. Endocrinology and Prevention and Care of Diabetes Unit , IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico S.Orsola di Bologna , Bologna , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) panels that include glucocorticoid-related steroids are increasingly used to characterize and diagnose adrenal cortical diseases. Limited information is currently available about reproducibility of these measurements among laboratories. The aim of the study was to compare LC-MS/MS measurements of corticosterone, 11-deoxycortisol and cortisone at eight European centers and assess the performance after unification of calibration. Methods Seventy-eight patient samples and commercial calibrators were measured twice by laboratory-specific procedures. Results were obtained according to in-house and external calibration. We evaluated intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory imprecision, regression and agreement against performance specifications derived from 11-deoxycortisol biological variation. Results Intra-laboratory CVs ranged between 3.3 and 7.7%, 3.3 and 11.8% and 2.7 and 12.8% for corticosterone, 11-deoxycortisol and cortisone, with 1, 4 and 3 laboratories often exceeding the maximum allowable imprecision (MAI), respectively. Median inter-laboratory CVs were 10.0, 10.7 and 6.2%, with 38.5, 50.7 and 2.6% cases exceeding the MAI for corticosterone, 11-deoxycortisol and cortisone, respectively. Median laboratory bias vs. all laboratory-medians ranged from −5.6 to 12.3% for corticosterone, −14.6 to 12.4% for 11-deoxycortisol and −4.0 to 6.5% for cortisone, with few cases exceeding the total allowable error. Modest deviations were found in regression equations among most laboratories. External calibration did not improve 11-deoxycortisol and worsened corticosterone and cortisone inter-laboratory comparability. Conclusions Method imprecision was variable. Inter-laboratory performance was reasonably good. However, cases with imprecision and total error above the acceptable limits were apparent for corticosterone and 11-deoxycortisol. Variability did not depend on calibration but apparently on imprecision, accuracy and specificity of individual methods. Tools for improving selectivity and accuracy are required to improve harmonization.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3