Establishing pre-analytical requirements and maximizing peptide recovery in the analytical phase for mass spectrometric quantification of amyloid-β peptides 1–42 and 1–40 in CSF
Author:
Forgrave Lauren M.1, van der Gugten J. Grace2, Nguyen Quyen1, DeMarco Mari L.12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada 2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine , St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Health Care , Vancouver , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including Aβ42 (residues 1–42) and Aβ40 (residues 1–40), are utilized as biomarkers in the diagnostic workup of Alzheimer’s disease. Careful consideration has been given to the pre-analytical and analytical factors associated with measurement of these peptides via immunoassays; however, far less information is available for mass spectrometric methods. As such, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of pre-analytical and analytical factors specific to Aβ quantification using mass spectrometry.
Methods
Using our quantitative mass spectrometry assay for Aβ42 and Aβ40 in CSF, we investigated the potential for interference from hemolysate, bilirubin, lipids, and anti-Aβ-antibodies. We also optimized the composition of the calibrator surrogate matrix and Aβ recovery during and after solid phase extraction (SPE).
Results
There was no interreference observed with total protein up to 12 g/L, hemolysate up to 10% (v/v), bilirubin up to 0.5% (v/v), intralipid up to 1% (v/v), or anti-Aβ-antibodies at expected therapeutic concentrations. For hemolysate, bilirubin and lipids, visual CSF contamination thresholds were established. In the analytical phase, Aβ recovery was increased by ∼50% via SPE solvent modifications and by over 150% via modification of the SPE collection plate, which also extended analyte stability in the autosampler.
Conclusions
Attention to mass spectrometric-specific pre-analytical and analytical considerations improved analytical sensitivity and reproducibility, as well as, established CSF specimen acceptance and rejection criteria for use by the clinical laboratory.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Hampel, H, Frank, R, Broich, K, Teipel, SJ, Katz, RG, Hardy, J, et al.. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010;9:560–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3115. 2. Jack, CRJr., Knopman, DS, Jagust, WJ, Shaw, LM, Aisen, PS, Weiner, MW, et al.. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70299-6. 3. Dubois, B, Feldman, HH, Jacova, C, Hampel, H, Molinuevo, JL, Blennow, K, et al.. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:614–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70090-0. 4. Jack, CRJ, Bennett, DA, Blennow, K, Carrillo, MC, Dunn, B, Haeberlein, SB, et al.. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018;14:535–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018. 5. Jack, CRJ, Bennett, DA, Blennow, K, Carrillo, MC, Feldman, HH, Frisoni, GB, et al.. A/T/N: an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers. Neurology 2016;87:539–47. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002923.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|