Efficiency evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic strategy combining high throughput quantitative antigen immunoassay and real time PCR
Author:
Bernasconi Luca1ORCID, Neyer Peter1ORCID, Oberle Michael1, Schmid Bettina1, Martin Eileen2, Fankhauser Hans1, Haubitz Sebastian2, Hammerer-Lercher Angelika1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau AG , Aarau , Switzerland 2. Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Hygiene , Kantonsspital Aarau AG , Aarau , Switzerland
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Laboratory testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has played an important role in the effort to prevent and contain local outbreaks. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a new fully automated SARS-CoV-2 laboratory-based antigen assay (CoV2Ag) and to explore the efficiency of a diagnostic algorithm combining antigen and conventional high-throughput molecular assays to address potential future challenges of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Methods
One thousand two hundred and twenty four consecutive nasopharyngeal swabs were tested using RT-PCR and CoV2Ag assay.
Results
The overall sensitivity and specificity of CoV2Ag were 79.1 and 97.8%, respectively. When the analysis was restricted to cases with Ct values ≤30, the sensitivity of the assay improved to 98.1%. Acceptable sensitivity was found when the analysis was limited to patients presenting within one or two to four days of symptom onset (80.5 and 84.8%, respectively). A retrospective analysis of the use of a two-step diagnostic approach combining the CoV2Ag assay and RT-PCR during an acute pandemic phase of 97 days showed a potential reduction in the number of RT-PCR tests by 36.1%, corresponding to savings in reagent costs and technician workload of approximately €8,000 and 10.5 h per day, respectively.
Conclusions
Our data show that the proposed algorithm represents a valid alternative diagnostic approach to increase testing efficiency during future pandemic phases with high positivity rates (>20%) and elevated numbers of RT-PCR test requests.
Funder
Research Council Kantonsspital Aarau
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. World Health, O. Recommendations for national SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies and diagnostic capacities: interim guidance, 25 June 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. 2. Bohn, MK, Lippi, G, Horvath, AR, Erasmus, R, Grimmler, M, Gramegna, M, et al.. IFCC interim guidelines on rapid point-of-care antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1507–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0455. 3. Dinnes, J, Sharma, P, Berhane, S, van Wyk, SS, Nyaaba, N, Domen, J, et al.. Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022;7:Cd013705. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3. 4. Brummer, LE, Katzenschlager, S, McGrath, S, Schmitz, S, Gaeddert, M, Erdmann, C, et al.. Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors. PLoS Med 2022;19:e1004011, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004011. 5. Salvagno, GL, Gianfilippi, G, Fiorio, G, Pighi, L, De Nitto, S, Henry, BM, et al.. Clinical assessment of the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag chemiluminescence immunoassay. EJIFCC 2021;32:216–23.
|
|