Developing a machine learning prediction algorithm for early differentiation of urosepsis from urinary tract infection
Author:
Su Mingkuan1, Guo Jianfeng1, Chen Hongbin1, Huang Jiancheng1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine , Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University , Fuan City , P.R. China
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Early recognition and timely intervention for urosepsis are key to reducing morbidity and mortality. Blood culture has low sensitivity, and a long turnaround time makes meeting the needs of clinical diagnosis difficult. This study aimed to use biomarkers to build a machine learning model for early prediction of urosepsis.
Methods
Through retrospective analysis, we screened 157 patients with urosepsis and 417 patients with urinary tract infection. Laboratory data of the study participants were collected, including data on biomarkers, such as procalcitonin, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein. We split the data into training (80%) and validation datasets (20%) and determined the average model prediction accuracy through cross-validation.
Results
In total, 26 variables were initially screened and 18 were statistically significant. The influence of the 18 variables was sorted using three ranking methods to further determine the best combination of variables. The Gini importance ranking method was found to be suitable for variable filtering. The accuracy rates of the six machine learning models in predicting urosepsis were all higher than 80%, and the performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) was the best among all. When the ANN included the eight biomarkers with the highest influence ranking, its model had the best prediction performance, with an accuracy rate of 92.9% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.946.
Conclusions
Urosepsis can be predicted using only the top eight biomarkers determined by the ranking method. This data-driven predictive model will enable clinicians to make quick and accurate diagnoses.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference29 articles.
1. Jiang, L, Lin, SH, Wang, J, Chu, CK. Prognostic values of procalcitonin and platelet in the patient with urosepsis. Medicine 2021;100:e26555. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000026555. 2. Evans, L, Rhodes, A, Alhazzani, W, Antonelli, M, Coopersmith, CM, French, C, et al.. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med 2021;49:e1063–143. 3. Goh, KH, Wang, L, Yeow, AYK, Poh, H, Li, K, Yeow, JJL, et al.. Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare. Nat Commun 2021;12:711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20910-4. 4. Giacobbe, DR, Mikulska, M, Tumbarello, M, Furfaro, E, Spadaro, M, Losito, AR, et al.. Combined use of serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan and procalcitonin for the early differential diagnosis between candidaemia and bacteraemia in intensive care units. Crit Care 2017;21:176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1763-5. 5. Pierrakos, C, Velissaris, D, Bisdorff, M, Marshall, JC, Vincent, JL. Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal. Crit Care 2020;24:287. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02993-5.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|