Stability of ten serum tumor markers after one year of storage at −18°C
Author:
Mondésert Etienne1, De Brauwere David-Paul2, Lumbroso Serge3, Brouillet Jean-Paul3, Bancal Candice3
Affiliation:
1. Service de Biochimie , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier , Montpellier , France 2. Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire , UM Pathologies Héréditaires du Métabolisme et Du Globule Rouge, Hospices civils de Lyon , Lyon , France 3. Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Université de Montpellier , Nîmes , France
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The storage of serum tumor markers (STM) at −18 °C for one year has been a legal requirement in France since 1999, but has been abolished in 2022. This raises the question of the relevance of maintaining these biobanks in terms of conditions of storage. These should only be implemented after validation; in order to maintain the integrity of the biological sample and must be controlled over time according to the laboratoryʼs procedures. The aim of the study was to assess the suitability of storing 10 STMs by evaluating their stability after one year of storage at −18 °C.
Methods
A new immuno-enzymatic assay (A+1) was conducted on samples that had been stored at −18 °C for one year after an initial assay (A) of one of the following STMs: carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), total (TPSA), and free (FPSA) prostate-specific antigen, calcitonin (CT), thyroglobulin (TG), and neuro-specific enolase (NSE). The results were confronted to four different permissible error sources.
Results
In total, 1148 A+1 assays were performed. A strong correlation between A+1 and A values was found for all analytes, but with a statistically significant reduction in the mean A+1 concentration compared to the mean A concentration in 7/10 STMs. The bias induced by conservation seems to be technically unsustainable if we rely on the repositories closest to the current analytical performances.
Conclusions
These results support the discontinuation of mandatory STM biobank storage at −18 °C, which requires considerable technical time and organizational effort.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference17 articles.
1. Official Journal of the French Republic, No.287, December 11, 1999. 2. Official Journal of the French Republic, No.219, September 21, 2022. 3. Mosele, F, Remon, J, Mateo, J, Westphalen, CB, Barlesi, F, Lolkema, MP, et al.. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol 2020;31:1491–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.014. 4. Perrier, A, Hainaut, P, Lamy, PJ, Guenoun, A, Nguyen, DP, Guerber, F, et al.. Utilisation clinique et évolution des biomarqueurs circulants à l’ère de l’oncologie personnalisée : des marqueurs protéiques aux scores clinicobiologiques [Clinical use and evolution of circulating biomarkers in the era of personalized oncology: from protein markers to bioclinical scores]. Bull Cancer 2022;109:151–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.11.010. 5. Zhang, M, Cheng, S, Jin, Y, Zhao, Y, Wang, Y. Roles of CA125 in diagnosis, prediction, and oncogenesis of ovarian cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2021;1875:188503.
|
|