Evaluation of a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay platform
Author:
Yu Minghang123ORCID, Chen Danying123ORCID, Tang Xiaomeng123ORCID, Zhang Yuanyuan123ORCID, Liang Pu123, Xiong Yang123, Li Rui123, Song Rui3, Chen Xiaoyou3, Zhao Xuesen123ORCID, Wang Xi123ORCID, Jin Ronghua1234ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases , Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , P.R. China 2. Beijing Institute of Infectious Diseases , Beijing , P.R. China 3. National Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , P.R. China 4. Changping Laboratory , Beijing , P.R. China
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To describe a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test that is based on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay (LiCA®), and to validate its analytical characteristics and clinical agreement on detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection against the reference molecular test.
Methods
Analytical performance was validated and detection limits were determined using different types of nucleocapsid protein samples. 798-pair anterior nasal swab specimens were collected from hospitalized patients and asymptomatic screening individuals. Agreement between LiCA® antigen and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was evaluated.
Results
Repeatability and within-lab precision were 1.6–2.3%. The C5∼C95 interval was −5.1–4.6% away from C50. Detection limits in average (SD) were 325 (±141) U/mL on the national reference panel, 0.07 (±0.04) TCID50/mL on active viral cultures, 0.27 (±0.09) pg/mL on recombinant nucleocapsid proteins and 1.07 (±1.01) TCID50/mL on inactivated viral suspensions, respectively. LiCA detected a median of 374-fold (IQR 137–643) lower levels of the viral antigen than comparative rapid tests. As reference to the rRT-PCR method, overall sensitivity and specificity were determined to be 97.5% (91.4–99.7%) and 99.9% (99.2–100%), respectively. Total agreement between both methods was 99.6% (98.7–99.9%) with Cohen’s kappa 0.98 (0.96–1). A positive detection rate of 100% (95.4–100%) was obtained as Ct≤37.8.
Conclusions
The LiCA® system provides an exceptionally high-sensitivity and fully automated platform for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasal swabs. The assay may have high potential use for large-scale population screening and surveillance of COVID-19 as an alternative to the rRT-PCR test.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology of China Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Youth Programme National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine National Natural Science Foundation of China Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. Feng, W, Zong, W, Wang, F, Ju, S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): a review. Mol Cancer 2020;19:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01218-1. 2. Basheer, SN, Vinothkumar, TS, Albar, NHM, Karobari, MI, Renugalakshmi, A, Bokhari, A, et al.. Knowledge of COVID-19 infection guidelines among the dental health care professionals of Jazan region, Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2022;19:2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042034. 3. Fontanet, A, Autran, B, Lina, B, Kieny, MP, Karim, SSA, Sridhar, D. SARS-CoV-2 variants and ending the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2021;397:952–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00370-6. 4. World Health Organization. Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected cases. Interim guidance; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-331501. 5. Bohn, MK, Mancini, N, Loh, TP, Wang, CB, Grimmler, M, Gramegna, M, et al.. IFCC interim guidelines on molecular testing of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1993–2000. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1412.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|