Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Author:
Bauçà Josep Miquel1, Imperiali Claudia E.2, Robles Juan1, Díaz-Garzón Jorge3, Vuljanic Dora4, Begovic Ermin5, Tikhonov Aleksei6, Alic Lejla7, Nikler Ana4, Simundic Ana-Maria48
Affiliation:
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine , Hospital Universitari Son Espases , Palma , Spain 2. Clinical Laboratory, Viladecans Hospital , Barcelona , Spain 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine , Hospital Universitario La Paz , Madrid , Spain 4. Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics , University Hospital “Sveti Duh” , Zagreb , Croatia 5. Department of Medical Biochemistry and Immunology , Clinical Center University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina 6. Laboratory of Biological Microchips , Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences , Moscow , Russia 7. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine , University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina 8. Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry , University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Young laboratory medicine professionals (YLMPs) are the future of clinical laboratories. Although everyday practice shows significant differences among countries, especially during residency training, most of them face the same challenges. Besides promoting scientific, professional and clinical aspects of laboratory medicine in Europe, the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) should take into consideration YLMPs’ concerns and interests to help them achieve excellence. The aim of this survey was to assess the opinion and expectations of YLMPs about their involvement in the activities of EFLM.
Methods
An online survey was distributed to YLMPs in Europe through different channels. The questionnaire consisted of 21 items grouped into five sections: demographic questions, opinion about the current status of YLMPs within EFLM, YLMPs network, suggestions and opportunities, and scientific training and exchange. Where appropriate, responses from residents and specialists were compared.
Results
A total of 329 valid responses were obtained from 53 different countries. Countries with the highest number of participants were Spain, Turkey, Croatia and Romania. A significant percentage would like to know more about EFLM and their activities (86%) and wish EFLM promoted networking and scientific exchanges (95%), for instance by means of a European YLMPs network (93%). EFLMLabX project was widely unknown (75%).
Conclusions
YLMPs demand better connection to share concerns about daily healthcare duties, to keep updated and to advance professionally. EFLM needs to improve their advertising through national societies to increase YLMPs’ participation. In addition to international meetings and congresses, respondents have emphasized that workshops and other small group activities would significantly help promote laboratory medicine practice in Europe.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference13 articles.
1. Bauça, JM. Reflections on the mentor-mentee relationship: a symbiosis. eJIFCC 2018;29:230–33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247135/pdf/ejifcc-29-230.pdf. 2. Greaves, RF, Smith, JM, Beastall, G, Florkowski, C, Langman, L, Sheldon, S, et al. The IFCC curriculum – phase 1. eJIFCC 2018;29:55–3. https://www.ifcc.org/media/477266/ejifcc2018vol29no1pp055-093.pdf. 3. Plebani, M, Laposata, M, Lippi, G. A manifesto for the future of laboratory medicine professionals. Clin Chim Acta 2019;489:49–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.021. 4. Greaves, R, Bernardini, S, Ferrari, M, Fortina, P, Gouget, B, Gruson, D, et al. Key questions about the future of laboratory medicine in the next decade of the 21st century: a report from the IFCC-emerging technologies division. Clin Chim Acta 2019;495:570–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.05.021. 5. Sanders, GT, Beastall, GH, Kohse, KP, Zérah, S, Jansen, R, Köller, U, et al. The practice of clinical chemistry in the European Union. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:196–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2002.033.
|
|