Lack of analytical interference of dydrogesterone in progesterone immunoassays
Author:
Eggersmann Tanja K.1ORCID, Wolthuis Albert2, van Amsterdam Peter H.3, Griesinger Georg1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology , University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck , Luebeck , Germany 2. Stichting Certe Medische Diagnostiek en Advies , Groningen , the Netherlands 3. Abbott Healthcare Products B.V. , Weesp , the Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Progesterone, a sex steroid, is measured in serum by immunoassay in a variety of clinical contexts. One potential limitation of steroid hormone immunoassays is interference caused by compounds with structural similarity to the target steroid of the assay. Dydrogesterone (DYD), an orally active stereoisomer of progesterone, is used for various indications in women’s health. Herein, we report a systematic in vitro investigation of potential interference of DYD and its active metabolite 20α-dihydrodydrogesterone (DHD) in seven widely used, commercially available progesterone assays.
Methods
Routine human plasma samples were anonymized and pooled to create three graded concentration levels of progesterone (P4 high, P4 medium, P4 low). Each pooled P4 plasma sample (6–7 mL) was spiked at high, medium, and “none” concentration with DYD/DHD and was divided into 0.5 mL aliquots. The blinded aliquots were analyzed by seven different laboratories with their routine progesterone assay (six different immunoassays and one liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry assay, respectively) within the Dutch working group on endocrine laboratory diagnostics of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessments in Medical Laboratories.
Results
The sample recovery rate (P4 result obtained for sample spiked with DYD/DHD, divided by the result obtained for the corresponding sample with no DYD/DHD × 100) was within a ±10% window for the medium and high P4 concentrations, but more variable for the low P4 samples. The latter is, however, attributable to high inter- and intra-method variability at low P4 concentrations.
Conclusions
This study does not indicate any relevant interference of DYD/DHD within routinely used progesterone assays.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference27 articles.
1. Csapo, AI, Pulkkinen, M. Indispensability of the human corpus luteum in the maintenance of early pregnancy. Luteectomy evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1978;33:69–81, https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-197802000-00001. 2. Baird, DD, Wilcox, AJ, Weinberg, CR, Kamel, F, McConnaughey, DR, Musey, PI, et al.. Preimplantation hormonal differences between the conception and non-conception menstrual cycles of 32 normal women. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2607–13, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.12.2607. 3. Czajkowski, K, Sienko, J, Mogilinski, M, Bros, M, Szczecina, R, Czajkowska, A. Uteroplacental circulation in early pregnancy complicated by threatened abortion supplemented with vaginal micronized progesterone or oral dydrogesterone. Fertil Steril 2007;87:613–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1506. 4. Arck, PC, Hecher, K. Fetomaternal immune cross-talk and its consequences for maternal and offspring’s health. Nat Med 2013;19:548–56, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3160. 5. Ghosh, S, Chattopadhyay, R, Goswami, S, Chaudhury, K, Chakravarty, B, Ganesh, A. Assessment of sub-endometrial blood flow parameters following dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone administration in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:1871–6, https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12456.
|
|