Fifty years of newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism: current status in Australasia and the case for harmonisation

Author:

Huynh Tony123ORCID,Greaves Ronda45ORCID,Mawad Nazha45,Greed Lawrence6,Wotton Tiffany7,Wiley Veronica7,Ranieri Enzo8,Rankin Wayne9,Ungerer Jacobus310,Price Ricky11,Webster Dianne1213,Heather Natasha1213

Affiliation:

1. Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes , Queensland Children’s Hospital , South Brisbane , QLD , Australia

2. Department of Chemical Pathology , Mater Pathology , South Brisbane , QLD , Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine , The University of Queensland , Brisbane , QLD , Australia

4. Department of Biochemical Genetics , Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Parkville , VIC , Australia

5. Department of Paediatrics , University of Melbourne , Parkville , VIC , Australia

6. Western Australia Newborn Screening Programme , PathWest , WA , Australia

7. NSW Newborn Screening Programme, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead , Westmead , NSW , Australia

8. Department of Biochemical Genetics , SA Pathology , Adelaide , SA , Australia

9. Department of Chemical Pathology , SA Pathology , Adelaide , SA , Australia

10. Department of Chemical Pathology , Pathology Queensland , Herston , QLD , Australia

11. Newborn Screening Unit , Pathology Queensland , Herston , QLD , Australia

12. National Newborn Metabolic Screening programme, Specialist Chemical Pathology , LabPlus , Auckland , New Zealand

13. Liggins Institute, University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Since its implementation 50 years ago in Quebec, Canada, newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism has become one of the most successful public health measures worldwide. Screening programmes across Australia and New Zealand are characterised by significant commonalities in screening algorithms, and a high degree of regional cooperation in harmonisation efforts. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive survey of current performance and practices related to the total testing process for congenital hypothyroidism screening and provide recommendations for harmonisation priorities within our region. Methods A survey was conducted involving the six newborn screening laboratories which provide complete geographic coverage across Australasia. Approximately 360,000 newborns are screened annually. Survey questions incorporated pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical aspects of the screening programmes and an extensive 5-year (2016–2020) retrospective analysis of individual programme performance data. Responses from individual screening programmes were collated. Results The uptake of newborn screening was over 98% for the six major jurisdictions. All programmes have adopted a single-tier thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) strategy using the Perkin Elmer GSP instrument. Significant similarities exist between programmes for recommended age of collection and recollection protocols for low birthweight newborns. The process for the determination of TSH cutoffs varies between programmes. TSH lower cut-offs for borderline-positive and positive notifications between 12–15 and 12–25 mIU/L blood, respectively. Recall rates vary between 0.08 and 0.20%. The case definition for congenital hypothyroidism generally includes biochemical and radiological parameters in addition to the commencement of thyroxine. All programmes reported collecting biochemical and clinical data on infants with positive screening tests, and positive predictive values vary between 23.6 and 77.3%. Variation in reported incidence (1:1,300–2,000) cannot be entirely explained by cutoff or recall rate (although one programme reporting fewer cases includes only permanent disease). Conclusions Despite similarities between newborn screening algorithms for congenital hypothyroidism across Australia and New Zealand, differences in reported programme performance provide the basis for further harmonisation. Surveillance of a large population offers the potential for the ongoing development of evidence-based screening guidelines.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3