A new tool for sepsis screening in the Emergency Department
Author:
Agnello Luisa1, Iacona Alessandro2, Lo Sasso Bruna12, Scazzone Concetta1, Pantuso Michele1, Giglio Rosaria Vincenza1, Gambino Caterina Maria1, Ciaccio Anna Maria3, Bivona Giulia1, Vidali Matteo4, Ciaccio Marcello12
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine , University Hospital “P. Giaccone” , Palermo , Italy 3. University Hospital “P. Giaccone” , Palermo , Italy 4. Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
In this study, we developed and evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Sepsis Index for early sepsis screening in the Emergency Department (ED).
Methods
Sepsis Index is based on the combination of monocyte distribution width (MDW) and mean monocyte volume (MMV). Sepsis Index≥1 was selected to define sepsis. We tested its diagnostic accuracy in an ED population stratified in four groups: controls, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), infection, and sepsis, according to Sepsis-2 criteria.
Results
Patients with sepsis displayed higher median Sepsis Index value than patients without sepsis. At the receiver operating characterictis (ROC) curve analysis for the prediction of sepsis, the area under the curve (AUC) of MDW and Sepsis Index were similar: 0.966 (95%CI 0.947–0.984), and 0.964 (95%CI 0.942–0.985), respectively. Sepsis Index showed increased specificity than MDW (94.7 vs. 90.6%), without any decrease in sensitivity (92.0%). Additionally, LR+ increased from 9.8 (MDW) to 17.4 (Sepsis Index), without any substantial change in LR− (respectively 0.09 vs. 0.08). Finally, PPV increased from 0.286 (MDW) to 0.420 (Sepsis Index).
Conclusions
Sepsis Index improves the diagnostic accuracy of MDW alone for sepsis screening.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference16 articles.
1. Rudd, KE, Johnson, SC, Agesa, KM, Shackelford, KA, Tsoi, D, Kievlan, DR, et al.. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395:200–11. 2. Jordan Kempker, A, Rudd, KE, Wang, HE, Martin, GS. Sepsis epidemiology across the international classification of diseases, 9th edition, to international classification of diseases, 10th edition, chasm-A direct application of the institute for health metrics and evaluation case definition to hospital discharge data. Crit Care Med 2020;48:1881–4. 3. Giulia, B, Luisa, A, Concetta, S, Bruna, LS, Chiara, B, Marcello, C. Procalcitonin and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children. Clin Chim Acta 2015;451:215–8. 4. Bellia, C, Agnello, L, Lo Sasso, B, Bivona, G, Raineri, MS, Giarratano, A, et al.. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin predicts poor outcome in non-selected patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:549–55. 5. Agnello, L, Bivona, G, Parisi, E, Lucido, GD, Iacona, A, Ciaccio, AM, et al.. Presepsin and midregional proadrenomedullin in pediatric oncologic patients with febrile neutropenia. Lab Med 2020;51:585–91.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|