CSF and plasma Aβ42/40 across Alzheimer’s disease continuum: comparison of two ultrasensitive Simoa® assays targeting distinct amyloid regions
Author:
Wojdała Anna Lidia1ORCID, Bellomo Giovanni1ORCID, Toja Andrea1, Gaetani Lorenzo1, Parnetti Lucilla1, Chiasserini Davide2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery , University of Perugia , Perugia , Italy 2. Section of Physiology and Biochemistry, Department of Medicine and Surgery , University of Perugia , Perugia , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Decreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40) is one of the core Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers. Measurement of Aβ42/40 in plasma has also been proposed as a surrogate marker for amyloidosis, however the validity and the diagnostic performance of this biomarker is still uncertain. Here we evaluated two immunoassays targeting distinct regions of the amyloid peptides by (a) performing a method comparison in both CSF and plasma, and (b) assessing the diagnostic performance across the AD continuum.
Methods
We used N4PE and N3PA Simoa® assays to measure Aβ42/40 in CSF and plasma of 134 patients: preclinical AD (pre-AD, n=19), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD, n=41), AD at the dementia stage (AD-dem, n=35), and a control group (CTRL, n=39). The N4PE includes a detector antibody targeting the amyloid N-terminus, while the N3PA uses a detector targeting amyloid mid-region.
Results
Method comparison of N4PE and N3PA assays revealed discrepancies in assessment of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40. While the diagnostic performance of the two assays did not significantly differ in CSF, in plasma, N4PE assay provided better accuracy for AD discrimination than N3PA assay (AUC AD-dem vs. CTRL 0.77 N4PE, 0.68 N3PA).
Conclusions
While both Aβ42/40 assays allowed for an effective discrimination between CTRL and different AD stages, the assay targeting amyloid N-terminal region provided the best diagnostic performance in plasma. Differences observed in technical and diagnostic performance of the two assays may depend on matrix-specific amyloid processing, suggesting that further studies should be carried to standardize amyloid ratio measurement in plasma.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Parkinson’s Foundation
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference37 articles.
1. Jack, CR, Bennett, DA, Blennow, K, Carrillo, MC, Dunn, B, Haeberlein, SB, et al.. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement 2018;14:535–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018. 2. van Dyck, CH, Swanson, CJ, Aisen, P, Bateman, RJ, Chen, C, Gee, M, et al.. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2023;388:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2212948. 3. Zetterberg, H, Blennow, K. Moving fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease from research tools to routine clinical diagnostics. Mol Neurodegener 2021;16:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-021-00430-x. 4. Blennow, K, Zetterberg, H. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: current status and prospects for the future. J Intern Med 2018;284:643–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12816. 5. Teunissen, CE, Verberk, IMW, Thijssen, EH, Vermunt, L, Hansson, O, Zetterberg, H, et al.. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: towards clinical implementation. Lancet Neurol 2022;21:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00361-6.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|