Pitfalls in the diagnosis of hematuria
Author:
Delanghe Joris1ORCID, Speeckaert Marijn23, Delanghe Sigurd3, Oyaert Matthijs4
Affiliation:
1. Department of Diagnostic Sciences , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium 2. Department of Nephrology , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium 3. Research Foundation Flanders , Brussels , Belgium 4. Department of Laboratory Medicine , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
Detection of hemoglobin (Hb) and red blood cells in urine (hematuria) is characterized by a large number of pitfalls. Clinicians and laboratory specialists must be aware of these pitfalls since they often lead to medical overconsumption or incorrect diagnosis. Pre-analytical issues (use of vacuum tubes or urine tubes containing preservatives) can affect test results. In routine clinical laboratories, hematuria can be assayed using either chemical (test strips) or particle-counting techniques. In cases of doubtful results, Munchausen syndrome or adulteration of the urine specimen should be excluded. Pigmenturia (caused by the presence of dyes, urinary metabolites such as porphyrins and homogentisic acid, and certain drugs in the urine) can be easily confused with hematuria. The peroxidase activity (test strip) can be positively affected by the presence of non-Hb peroxidases (e.g. myoglobin, semen peroxidases, bacterial, and vegetable peroxidases). Urinary pH, haptoglobin concentration, and urine osmolality may affect specific peroxidase activity. The implementation of expert systems may be helpful in detecting preanalytical and analytical errors in the assessment of hematuria. Correcting for dilution using osmolality, density, or conductivity may be useful for heavily concentrated or diluted urine samples.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference54 articles.
1. Sternberg, KM, Awad, MA, Goldsmith, M, Hallgarth, LA, Raman, JD. Laboratory reporting parameters of microhematuria: implications for interpreting the 2020 AUA guideline. Urology 2021;154:24–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.014. 2. Fogazzi, GB, Saglimbeni, L, Banfi, G, Cantú, M, Moroni, G, Garigali, G, et al.. Urinary sediment features in proliferative and non-proliferative glomerular diseases. J Nephrol 2005;18:703–10. 3. Saha, MK, Massicotte-Azarniouch, D, Reynolds, ML, Mottl, AK, Falk, RJ, Jennette, JC, et al.. Glomerular hematuria and the utility of urine microscopy: a review. Am J Kidney Dis 2022;80:383–92. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.022. 4. Madeb, R, Golijanin, D, Knopf, J, Davis, M, Feng, C, Fender, A, et al.. Long-term outcome of patients with a negative work-up for asymptomatic microhematuria. Urology 2010;75:20–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.107. 5. Rao, PK, Gao, T, Pohl, M, Jones, JS. Dipstick pseudohematuria: unnecessary consultation and evaluation. J Urol 2010;183:560–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.049.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|