Point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin-I analysis in capillary blood for acute coronary syndrome diagnostics
Author:
Bruinen Anne L.1, Frenk Lisa D.S.1, de Theije Femke2, Kemper Daniëlle W.M.2, Janssen Marcel J.W.1, Rahel Braim M.1, Meeder Joan G.1, van ‘t Hof Arnoud W.J.3
Affiliation:
1. VieCuri Medical Center , Venlo , The Netherlands 2. Siemens Healthineers , Eindhoven , The Netherlands 3. Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should be referred promptly to the hospital to reduce mortality and morbidity. Differentiating between low-risk and high-risk patients remains a diagnostic challenge. Point-of-care testing can contribute to earlier disposition decisions for patients excluded from ACS. This study describes the validation of the Atellica® VTLi. Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer for high-sensitivity troponin point-of-care (POC) analysis. (The Atellica VTLi is not available for sale in the USA. The products/features (mentioned herein) are not commercially available in all countries. Their future availability cannot be guaranteed).
Methods
A total of 152 patients with acute chest pain admitted at the cardiac emergency department (ED) were included in the study. Capillary blood was compared with a whole blood and plasma sample obtained by venipuncture. All samples were analyzed using the Atellica VTLi Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer; in addition, plasma was analyzed by a central lab immunoassay analyzer.
Results
No significant difference was observed between venous whole blood vs. plasma analyzed by the Atellica VTLi Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer. The difference between capillary blood and venous blood showed a constant bias of 7.1%, for which a correction factor has been implemented. No clinically relevant differences were observed for the capillary POC results compared to plasma analyzed with a standard immunoassay analyzer.
Conclusions
The Atellica VTLi Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer for high-sensitivity troponin analysis shows equivalent results for all sample types, including capillary blood. No clinically relevant discordances were observed between capillary POC and central laboratory results. With additional studies, this could pave the way towards rapid testing of high-sensitivity troponin in the ambulance or the general practitioner’s office without the need for hospitalization of patients with acute chest pain.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference16 articles.
1. Hoorweg, BB, Willemsen, RT, Cleef, LE, Boogaerts, T, Buntinx, F, Glatz, JF, et al.. Frequency of chest pain in primary care, diagnostic tests performed and final diagnoses. Heart 2017;103:1727–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310905. 2. Plat, FM, Peters, YAS, Loots, FJ, de Groot, CJA, Eckhardt, T, Keizer, E, et al.. Ambulance dispatch versus general practitioner home visit for highly urgent out-of-hours primary care. Fam Pract. 2018;35:440–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx121. 3. Backus, BE, Tolsma, RT, Boogers, MJ. The new era of chest pain evaluation in The Netherlands. Eur J Emerg Med 2020;27:243–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/mej.0000000000000711. 4. Bösner, S, Becker, A, Haasenritter, J, Abu Hani, M, Keller, H, Sönnichsen, AC, et al.. Chest pain in primary care: epidemiology and pre-work-up probabilities. Eur J Gen Pract 2009;15:141–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814780903329528. 5. Webster, R, Norman, P, Goodacre, S, Thompson, A. The prevalence and correlates of psychological outcomes in patients with acute non-cardiac chest pain: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:267–73. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2011-200526.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|