Optimization of divertor design for Pakistan spherical tokamak
Author:
Alam Ayesha1, Ud-Din Khan Shahab2, Abdullah Muhammad2, Khan Riaz2, Ilyas Muhammad1, Chaudri Khurram Saleem1, Ali Ahmad2, Shakir Sehrish2, Rehman Zia Ur2, Zahid Shahzaib2, Ali Rafaqat2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Nuclear Engineering (PIEAS) , P. O. Nilore, 45650 , Islamabad , Pakistan 2. Pakistan Tokamak Plasma Research Institute (PTPRI) , P. O. Box 3329 , Islamabad , Pakistan
Abstract
Abstract
Handling the power deposition, reducing erosion effects, and plasma configuration are the key factors in the design of a divertor. The design of Pakistan Spherical Tokamak (PST) is based on double-null divertor configuration with actively cooled graphite targets at outer/inner strike point and peak heat flux range capacity of 0.1–0.3 MW/m2. The configuration of PST divertor module is designed with mock-up (used flat type tiles on baffles and dome) and cassette (support PFC and cooling channels) technology. Helium-cooled stage and water-cooled stage are two options for divertor. Therefore, one part of this research is focused on water-cooling system for the divertor. This paper presents the divertor design for PST with cooling channel and material analysis of the divertor, which is carried out in three phases. In the first phase, the plasma edge temperature, density, particle velocity, input power, heat flux, and surface temperature are estimated. In second phase, physics and engineering design of divertor system has been performed. In the third phase, COMSOL simulation has been performed to analyses the material properties, surface temperature rise (∆T °C) at stable heat flux, and thermal hydraulic system for the divertor. It is found from the analysis that the specific heat flux of 0.3 MW/m2 up to 3 s is the safe zone limit. The R & D work ratifies that manufacturing and installation processes are plausible for the proposed divertor design. This design is able to meet the requirement of PST. However, increasing time or specific heat flux beyond these limits would require redesigning of the cooling channel.
Funder
IAEA Co-ordinated research project
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Materials Science,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Nuclear and High Energy Physics,Radiation
Reference24 articles.
1. Bamber, R., Iglesias, D., Asunta, O., Bunting, P., Daughtry, S., Dunbar, G., Hanks, S., Horozaniecki, A., Moore, P., Lockley, D., et al.. (2021). The ST40 IVC1 divertor project: procurement and installation in times of COVID-19. Fusion Eng. Des. 168: 112378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112378. 2. Bhatt, S., Lachhvani, L.T., Govindarajan, J., Reddy, D.C., Pandya, S.N., and Jadeja, K.A. (2007). Limiter thermography in ADITYA tokamak. In: 2007 IEEE 22nd symposium on fusion engineering. Albuquerque, NM, USA, pp. 1–4. 3. Hanada, K., Sato, K.N., Zushi, H., Nakamura, K., Sakamoto, M., Idei, H., Hasegawa, M., Takase, Y., Mitarai, O., Maekawa, T., et al.. (2008). Physical design of MW-class steady-state spherical tokamak, QUEST. International Nuclear Information System, Vol. 42, pp. 22, Available at: https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/meetings/fec2008/ft_p3-25.pdf. 4. Khan, S.U.D., Khan, S.U.D., Danish, S.N., and Haider, S. (2012). Theoretical calculation simulation studies of ABV nuclear reactor coupled with desalination system. Arch. Therm. 33: 23–40, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3363. 5. Khan, S.U.D., Khan, S.U.D., and Song, Y. (2015). Theoretical investigation of plasma dynamical behavior and halo current analysis. Int. J. Energy Res. 40: 497–506, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3455.
|
|