Application of the COCOSYS code in the safety evaluation of Czech nuclear power plants
Author:
Kecek Adam12, Denk Lubomír1, Zamakhaeva Iana1
Affiliation:
1. UJV Rez, a.s. , Hlavni 130, 250 68 Husinec-Rez , The Czech Republic 2. Department of Nuclear Reactors , Czech Technical University in Prague , V Holešovičkách 2, 180 00 Praha 8 , The Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
Safety analyses of nuclear power plant accidents are a key tool in demonstration of nuclear safety and reliability. The chain of the safety analyses comprises several follow-up activities like neutronic core calculation, primary system simulation and containment response to a loss-of-coolant accident. The analyses can be done with numerous computational tools like the GRS codes ATHLET and COCOSYS. The COCOSYS and its predecessor RALOC have been used in a variety of safety analyses at UJV conducted in the framework of technical support of the Czech nuclear power plants. Application of the code in the field of nuclear power plant safety analyses is ruled by the Czech legislative, which defines a process called standardization. The standardization procedure equivalent to validation and verification process provides further independent validation on the level of user organization. In past decades, COCOSYS has been successfully used in numerous DBA and DEC-A analyses of VVER-1000/V-320 containment, evaluating both thermal hydraulic conditions as well as fission product source term. This paper summarizes independent COCOSYS validation at UJV, including setup of the iodine dry paint deposition model to Ameron Amerlock paint. Furthermore, a VVER-1000/V-320 containment model is presented and analysis of DBA and DEC-A LB LOCA at VVER-1000/V-320 is conducted. The evaluation of the results aims at confirmation of acceptance criteria related to containment and impact of containment spray system. An emphasis is given to evaluation of containment source term, where comparison of both events is conducted for release of iodine, cesium, and xenon.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Materials Science,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Nuclear and High Energy Physics,Radiation
Reference20 articles.
1. AB Atomenergi (1974). The Marviken full scale containment experiments, description of the test facility, Report MXA-1-101. AB Atomenergi, Sweden. 2. Allelein, H.-J., Arndt, S., Klein-Hessling, W., Schwarz, S., Spengler, C., and Weber, G. (2008). COCOSYS: status of development and validation of the German containment code system. Nucl. Eng. Des. 238: 872–889, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.08.006. 3. Bae, B.-U., Lee, J.B., Park, Y.-S., Kim, J., and Kang, K.-H. (2022). Experimental investigation on thermal hydraulic interaction of RCS (reactor coolant system) and containment for intermediate break loss-of-coolant accident (IBLOCA) scenario in ATLAS-CUBE test facility. Prog. Nucl. Energy 146: 104156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104156. 4. ČEZ, ETE (2018). 1TL001, Basic operational instruction, limits and conditions, Základní provozní předpis, limity a podmínky. ČEZ JE Temelín, Revize 7 – 19. 12. 2018. Temelin, Czechia. 5. Denk, L. and Kecek, A. (2019). Methodology on containment source term calculation for estimation of radiological consequences of NPP accidents, Metodika výpočtů zdrojového členu z kontejnmentu pro určení radiačních následků nehod JE, UJV Z 5300 T. Řež, Czechia.
|
|