Study on calculation model and risk area of radionuclide diffusion in coastal waters under nuclear leakage accidents with different levels
Author:
Li Zichao1ORCID, Chen Rongchang1, Zhou Tao2, Liu Chen1, Si Guangcheng3, Xue Qingqing1
Affiliation:
1. China Waterborne Transport Research Institute , Beijing , 100088 , China 2. Southeast University, School of Energy and Environment , Nanjing , 210096 , China 3. Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Qingdao , 266071 , China
Abstract
Abstract
Study on calculation model and risk area of radionuclide diffusion in coastal waters under nuclear leakage accidents with different levels can help predict and evaluate consequences of radionuclide leakage accidents. Thus they play an important role in emergency response and accident mitigation. In the first step of the study, a climate hydrodynamic model in China coastal waters was established based on the climate data. In the next step, according to the real-time meteorological data, a hydrodynamic model in coastal waters of Haiyang nuclear power station was founded using the result of the climate hydrodynamic as a boundary. Then, according to the result of the hydrodynamic model in coastal waters of Haiyang nuclear power station, a radionuclide diffusion model in coastal waters of Haiyang nuclear power station was set up, in which the Euler method was adopted. With the radionuclide diffusion model, the total leaked radioactivity of radionuclides was set from 1018 Bq to 1012 Bq with a decrease of every two orders of magnitude. Thus, scenarios of radionuclide diffusion under assumed nuclear leakage accidents with different levels were calculated and their corresponding risk area were analyzed under the assumption that radionuclides leaked for consecutive five days. The results show that when the leaked radioactivity of radionuclides is 1018 Bq, the risk area on the seventh day is about 41 km east, 22 km south and 19 km west of the power station; on the fourteenth day, the risk area is about 65 km east, 22 km south and 25 km west of the power station. When the total leaked radioactivity of radionuclides declines by two orders of magnitude, the risk area will be reduced by about 10 km–20 km in the east direction accordingly. When it declines to 1014 Bq, the risk area decreases sharply to a small area. When it declines to 1012 Bq, the risk area is barely found. This model was verified from two aspects, namely the flow field and the radionuclide concentration. Hydrodynamic results can well describe the Yellow Sea cold water mass, Yellow Sea warm current and tidal current. Changes of radioactivity in different positions are fundamentally consistent with that in Fuikushima nuclear leakage accident. It indicates the hydrodynamic model and radionuclide diffusion model in the study are feasible and reliable.
Funder
the Fundamental Research Funds of Ministry of Finance the National Key Technologies Research and Development Program Ministry of Finance
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Materials Science,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Nuclear and High Energy Physics,Radiation
Reference21 articles.
1. Behrens, E., Schwarzkopf, F.U., Lübbecke, J.F., and Ning, C.W. (2012). Model simulations on the long-term dispersal of 137Cs released into the Pacific Ocean off Fukushima. Environ. Res. Lett. 7: 34004–34013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/F034004. 2. Bezhenar, R., Jung, K.T., Maderich, V., Willemsen, S., de With, G., and Qiao, F. (2016). Transfer of radiocaesium from contaminated bottom sediments to marine organisms through benthic food chains in post-Fukushima and post-Chernobyl periods. Biogeosciences 13: 3021–3034, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3021-2016. 3. Blumberg, A.F. and Mellor, G.L. (1987). A description of a three‐dimensional coastal ocean circulation model. In: Heaps, N.S. (Ed.), Coastal and estuarine sciences, book 4. American Geophysical Union, pp. 1–6. 4. Breton, M. and Salomon, J.C. (1995). A 2D long term advection-dispersion model for the channel and southern North Sea part a: validation through comparison with artificial radionuclides. J. Mar. Syst. 6: 495–513, https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-7963(95)00020-P. 5. Četina, M., Rajar, R., and Povinec, P. (2000). Modelling of circulation and dispersion of radioactive pollutants in the Japan Sea. Oceanol. Acta 23: 819–836, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(00)01120-8.
|
|