Comment on Rose: ‘Forensic and Expert Social Anthropology’-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comment on Rose: ‘Forensic and Expert Social Anthropology’

Published:2022-01-01 Issue:1 Volume:2 Page:76-79
ISSN:2657-4233
Container-title:Open Anthropological Research
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Good Anthony¹

Affiliation:

1. School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building , 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, Scotland , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract This comment considers the applicability of Rose’s model of forensic social anthropology to a range of legal contexts, in particular to immigration and asylum appeals in the United Kingdom.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opan-2022-0119/pdf

Reference9 articles.

1. Clifford, J. (1988). The Predicament of Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

2. Edmond, G. (2004). Thick decisions: expertise, advocacy and reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia. Oceania 74(3), 190–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.2004.tb02850.x.

3. Fontein, J. (2014). “She appeared to be in some kind of trance”: Anthropology and the question of unknowability in a criminal trial. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 14(2), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.003.

4. Good, A. (2006). Writing as a kind of anthropology: alternative professional genres. In G. De Neve & M. Unnithan-Kumar (Eds.). Critical Journeys: The Making of Anthropologists (pp. 91–115). Aldershot: Aldgate Press.

5. Good, A. (2007). Anthropology and Expertise in the Asylum Courts. Abingdon & New York: Routledge-Cavendish.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Understandings of Vulnerability and Social Determinants of Health in Forensic and Expert Social Anthropology: A Scoping Review;The Qualitative Report;2024-04-22