Freedom over Fear: Fundamentalist Populism and the Challenge of COVID-19

Author:

Westermeyer William H.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology , University of South Carolina , Aiken, 471 University Parkway, Aiken, South Carolina 29801, United States

Abstract

Abstract Although public responses to national and international crises are never without contestations and conflicting truth claims, the COVID-19 pandemic draws attention to the stark political and cultural divisions presented by conservative populism in the age of the Tea Party Movement and Donald Trump. Beginning with research among Tea Party activists in 2010 and continuing through the Trump Administration and “reopen” protests, I have documented a shifting cultural world of right-wing populism. The vivid and symbolically elaborate performance of patriotism and indignation by the Tea Party Movement declined in 2012, being replaced by a more belligerent and less colorful form of populism with Donald Trump. As Trump-inspired protests opposing COVID-19 mitigation policies emerged in 2020, however, Tea Party themes and symbols reemerged as frames for resistance to government restrictions. Yet, despite the shifting styles, there was a constant theme of what I term “fundamentalist populism.” This style illustrates political identities characterized by vilification of opponents, distrust of existing political and social institutions, ideological rigidity, and a rededication to individualism and personal freedom. Ethnographic and documentary research shows how these themes animate a small yet vocal resistance to the science-based and cooperative guidelines prescribed by public health experts

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics

Reference46 articles.

1. Berry, J. M., & Sobieraj, S. (2014). The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, USA.

2. Bieber, K., & Beyers, J. (2020). The Allegiance of White American Evangelicals to Donald Trump. Exchange, 49(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1163/1572543X-12341559

3. Bjork-James, S. (2020). Americanism, Trump, and Uniting the White Right. In S. Bjork-James & J. Maskovsky (Eds.), Beyond Populism: Angry Politics and the Twilight of Neoliberalism. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.

4. Burke, M. A. (2016). Race, Gender, and Class in the Tea Party: What the Movement Reflects about Mainstream Ideologies. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield

5. Clarke, J. (2004). Changing Welfare Changing States: New Directions in Social Policy. London: Sage.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3