Comparative Cellular Local Response in Abdominal Defect Plastic Surgery with Bovine Pericardium and Bovine Fascia Preserved in Formaldehyde in Experimental Rabbits
Author:
Gudemac Eva1, Babuci S.1, Tica C.2, Petrovici V.1, Nacu V.1, Ionescu C.3, Negru I.1
Affiliation:
1. State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemițanu”, Chisinau , Republic of Moldova 2. University “Ovidius” of Constanta, Faculty of Medicine, Constanta , Romania 3. Faculty of Medicine, Univeristy „Ovidius” of Constanta Universitatii Alee No. 1, Campus B, Constanta , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
In the present paper, we refer to a method of primary closure of congenital defects of the anterior abdominal wall with tensionless viscero-abdominal disproportion. The study group included 10 animals subjected to surgery of the abdominal wall defect closure with bovine pericardium graft preserved in 0.5% formaldehyde, and 5 rabbits of the same breed and weight, in which bovine fascia graft was used as implant, being preserved in 0.5% formaldehyde. The abdominal anterior wall defect was made surgically by excision of the musculo-fascial structures and peritoneum. Bovine pericardium graft and bovine fascia graft were placed and fixed posteriorly to rectus abdominals muscles, having direct contact with the intra-abdominal contents and protected by suturing skin and subcutaneous layer.
The purpose of the study was to perform a comparative postoperative evaluation of local macroscopic and microscopic changes that develop after reconstruction of the major abdominal wall defects experimentally induced in rabbits, using bovine pericardium and bovine fascia grafts preserved in 0.5% formaldehyde.
In cases of major fascial defects of the anterior abdominal wall, bovine pericardium graft has acceptable strength and biocompatibility, having stabilizing properties of the abdominal wall due to the development of the connective tissue layer located between the implant and the subcutaneous layer. Bovine fascia grafts preserved in formaldehyde have an insignificant irritating and inflammatory action on the intestinal loops compared with bovine pericardium, and do not induce the development of a significant abdominal adhesion process, this allowing their use in the abdominal fascial defects closure with placement in direct contact with the abdominal contents.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference44 articles.
1. 1. Fuentes, S., Marti, E., Delgado, M.D. & Gomez, A. (2016). Management of the sequelae of severe congenital abdominal wall defects. Arch. Plast. Surg.; 43:258-264. DOI: 10.5999/ aps.2016.43.3.258 2. 2. Jiang, W., Zhang, J., Lv, X., Lu, C., Chen, H., Xu, X. & Tang, W. (2016). Use of small intestinal submucosal and acellular dermal matrix grafts in giant omphaloceles in neonates and a rabbit abdominal wall defect model. J Pediatr Surg, 51(3), 368-373. doi: 10.1016/j. jpedsurg.2015.08.005 3. 3. Lambropoulos, V., Mylona, E., Mouravas, V., Tsakalidis, C., Spyridakis, I., Mitsiakos, G. & Karagianni, P. (2016). Repair of postoperative abdominal hernia in a child with congenital omphalocele using porcine dermal matrix. HPC. Case Rep; Art. ID 1828751. 5 pag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1828751 4. 4. Poussier, M., Denève, E., Blanc, P., Boulay, E., Bertrand, M., Nedelcu, M., Herrero, A., Fabre, J.-M. & Nocca, D. (2013). A review of available prosthetic material for abdominal wall repair. J. Chir. Visc.; 150:55-62. http://doi.org/10.1016/.jviscsurg.2012.10.002 5. 5. Risby, K., Jakobsen, M.S. & Qvist, N. (2016). Congenital Abdominal Wall Defects: Staged closure by Dual Mesh. J Neonatal Surg. 5(1), 2.
|
|